Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Feb-Mar;24(2-3):83-6.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9097-2. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

Intrauterine insemination in natural cycle may give better results in older women

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intrauterine insemination in natural cycle may give better results in older women

E Kalu et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Feb-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation (COH) in combination with intrauterine insemination (IUI) has been shown to result in significantly higher pregnancy rates compared to un-stimulated (natural cycle) IUI. This may however not be true in all ages.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study and analysed data collected prospectively on 1759 IUI cycles in couples with unexplained infertility. The results were analysed to show the outcome of IUI with COH, and IUI in natural cycle (unstimulated), in younger women compared to their older counterparts.

Results: In women age 37 and younger, COH resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (13.0% vs 6.5%) and live-birth rate (10.7% vs 5.2%) compared to natural cycle IUI (p = 0.025, p = 0.045 respectively). However for older women age >37 years, natural cycle (unstimulated) IUI, resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (12.0% vs 8.5%) live-birth rate (7.5%vs 3.5%) than IUI with COH ((p = 0.0037). This difference is even more significant when COH was performed with clomiphene citrate (7.5% vs 2.1%) (p = 0.0017).

Conclusion: COH was associated with a lower live birth rate in older women, irrespective of the agent used, and it seems to be worse when the anti-oestrogenic drug clomiphene citrate was used for COH. Older women may benefit more from natural cycle (unstimulated) IUI. A randomised controlled trial is required to confirm this observation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampf MP, Hill JA, Mastroianni L, Buster JE, Nakajima ST, Vogel DL, Canfield RE. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:177–183. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901213400302. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohlen BJ, Vandekerdkhove P, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF. Timed intercourse versus intrauterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2000;2:CD000360. - PubMed
    1. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence). Fertility: Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Clinical guidelines published by RCOG press. RCOG, 2004:75–80 - PubMed
    1. Paterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP, Poulson AM, Carrell DT. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with invitro-fertilisation and no therapy: A prospective, non-randomised, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:535–544. - PubMed
    1. Steures P, Van Der Steeg JW, Verhoeve HR, Van Dop PA, Hompes PGA, Bossuyt PMM, Van Der Veen F, Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Mol BWJ. Does ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination for cervical factor subfertility improve pregnancy rates? Hum Reprod. 2006;19:2263–2266. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh435. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types