Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space
- PMID: 17229840
- PMCID: PMC1783097
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610341104
Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space
Abstract
The nature of color categories in the world's languages is contested. One major view holds that color categories are organized around universal focal colors, whereas an opposing view holds instead that categories are defined at their boundaries by linguistic convention. Both of these standardly opposed views are challenged by existing data. Here, we argue for a third view based on a proposal by Jameson and D'Andrade [Jameson KA, D'Andrade RG (1997) in Color Categories in Thought and Language, eds Hardin CL, Maffi L (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, U.K.), pp 295-319]: that color naming across languages reflects optimal or near-optimal divisions of an irregularly shaped perceptual color space. We formalize this idea, test it against color-naming data from a broad range of languages and show that it accounts for universal tendencies in color naming while also accommodating some observed cross-language variation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Berlin B, Kay P. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1969.
-
- Roberson D, Davies I, Davidoff J. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000;129:369–398. - PubMed
-
- Roberson D, Davies IRL, Davidoff J. In: Theories, Technologies, Instrumentalities of Color: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives. Saunders B, van Brakel J, editors. Lanham, MD: Univ Press of Am; 2002.
-
- Roberson D, Davidoff J, Davies IR, Shapiro LR. Cognit Psychol. 2005;50:378–411. - PubMed
-
- Roberson D. Cross-Cult Res. 2005;39:56–71.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
