[Biomedical publications in Spain on debate (II): the on-going 'revolutions' and their application to neurological journals]
- PMID: 17236150
[Biomedical publications in Spain on debate (II): the on-going 'revolutions' and their application to neurological journals]
Abstract
To debate about the application of on-going 'revolutions' in medical knowledge to Spanish neurological journals in the 21st century. This article reviews the current status of five revolutions in the field of health sciences, in general, and in neurological sciences, in particular: 1) the knowledge revolution: to translate the scientific investigation to the patient, with knowledge needs-driven research agenda with founder commissioning research to answer questions posed by clinicians, managers and patients, and systematic and critical appraisal reviews as the creator of quality improved knowledge; 2) the evidence based medicine revolution: the pyramid information of '4S', with systems (guidelines and computerized decision support systems), synopses (secondary journals), syntheses (systematic reviews and meta-analysis) and studies (original studies published in journals); 3) the web revolution: the possibility of dissemination of biomedical documentation by means of the Internet network are producing changes in the traditional way of conceiving scientific publication; the Internet represents a great advantage for investigation and also for clinical practice, since it permits free, universal access to databases and the interchange of texts, images and videos; 4) the open access revolution: to take full control over all operations related to the process of publish (to create, publish, communicate, distribute, reproduce and transform) with no need of any intermediaries, and to transform fundamental aspects concerning the circulation of knowledge, its use and availability; and 5) the librarian revolution: the project of a Virtual Health Library in Spain as a tool to access and disseminate scientific and technical knowledge on health through the Internet.
Comment in
-
[Possible repercussions of the open access revolution for Latin American neuroscientists].Rev Neurol. 2007 Jun 16-30;44(12):768. Rev Neurol. 2007. PMID: 17583874 Spanish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Biomedical publications in Spain on debate (I): state of neurological journals].Rev Neurol. 2007 Jan 1-15;44(1):32-42. Rev Neurol. 2007. PMID: 17199227 Review. Spanish.
-
[Neuropediatrician and evidence-based medicine].Rev Neurol. 2008;47 Suppl 1:S75-95. Rev Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18767019 Spanish.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
[Role of medical journals in the shaping of medical knowledge].Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3441-3. Lakartidningen. 2004. PMID: 15560660 Swedish. No abstract available.
-
Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):253-62. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16888657 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
[Which Spanish journals are read and how Primary Care doctors keep informed].Aten Primaria. 2011 Dec;43(12):629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.11.008. Epub 2011 Jun 2. Aten Primaria. 2011. PMID: 21640438 Free PMC article. Spanish.