Relationship between bone ingrowth, mineral apposition rate, and osteoblast activity
- PMID: 17236212
- DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31087
Relationship between bone ingrowth, mineral apposition rate, and osteoblast activity
Abstract
To better understand skeletal attachment of porous coated total hip and knee implants over time, this study investigated the dynamics of osteoblast populations at the interface of porous coated implants in a weight-bearing ovine model. The relationship between cancellous bone ingrowth, mineral apposition rate (MAR), and osteoblast activity indicators such as osteoblast area, relative osteoblast number, osteoid width, and osteoid area (O.Ar.) were investigated. The data demonstrated that the percent O.Ar. was a marginally significant predictor of bone ingrowth and MAR over time, suggesting that the amount of osteoid present influenced bone ingrowth and MAR in the porous coated implants. The data also demonstrated that all osteoblast activity indicators were significantly greater in the porous coated region compared to the host bone region, while controlling for in situ time (p < 0.05). This may have been due to the trauma of implantation or the influence of the implant load on the bone tissue promoting a regional acceleratory phenomenon. The localized response suggests that specific therapies may be developed to affect the physiology of osteoblasts at the interface of implants, which may allow for improve skeletal attachment of biomaterials and clinical outcomes of cementless joint replacements.
Copyright 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Determining relevance of a weight-bearing ovine model for bone ingrowth assessment.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004 Jun 1;69(3):567-76. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30038. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004. PMID: 15127404
-
Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants.J Biomed Mater Res. 1994 May;28(5):537-44. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820280503. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994. PMID: 8027094
-
Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design.J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):1023-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.044. J Biomech. 2005. PMID: 15797584
-
The nature of the bone-implant interface. The lessons learned from implant retrieval and analysis in man and experimental animal.Med Prog Technol. 1994;20(3-4):119-42. Med Prog Technol. 1994. PMID: 7877558 Review.
-
Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Mar-Apr;13(2):163-74. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998. PMID: 9581401 Review.
Cited by
-
Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 May 14;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01696-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32408885 Free PMC article.
-
Elastomeric enriched biodegradable polyurethane sponges for critical bone defects: a successful case study reducing donor site morbidity.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016 Mar;27(3):61. doi: 10.1007/s10856-016-5667-8. Epub 2016 Jan 22. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016. PMID: 26800692
-
Effects of teriparatide on cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 19;17:300. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1149-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 27435235 Free PMC article.
-
Porous composite prosthetic pylon for integration with skin and bone.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(5):723-38. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.12.0160. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007. PMID: 17943684 Free PMC article.
-
Surface contaminants inhibit osseointegration in a novel murine model.Bone. 2011 Nov;49(5):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Jul 23. Bone. 2011. PMID: 21801863 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials