Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures
- PMID: 17237095
- DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl310
Using an alignment of fragment strings for comparing protein structures
Abstract
Motivation: Most methods that are used to compare protein structures use three-dimensional (3D) structural information. At the same time, it has been shown that a 1D string representation of local protein structure retains a degree of structural information. This type of representation can be a powerful tool for protein structure comparison and classification, given the arsenal of sequence comparison tools developed by computational biology. However, in order to do so, there is a need to first understand how much information is contained in various possible 1D representations of protein structure.
Results: Here we describe the use of a particular structure fragment library, denoted here as KL-strings, for the 1D representation of protein structure. Using KL-strings, we develop an infrastructure for comparing protein structures with a 1D representation. This study focuses on the added value gained from such a description. We show the new local structure language adds resolution to the traditional three-state (helix, strand and coil) secondary structure description, and provides a high degree of accuracy in recognizing structural similarities when used with a pairwise alignment benchmark. The results of this study have immediate applications towards fast structure recognition, and for fold prediction and classification.
Similar articles
-
PFRES: protein fold classification by using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure.Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2843-50. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm475. Epub 2007 Oct 17. Bioinformatics. 2007. PMID: 17942446
-
VISTAL--a new 2D visualization tool of protein 3D structural alignments.Bioinformatics. 2006 Sep 1;22(17):2166-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl353. Epub 2006 Jul 12. Bioinformatics. 2006. PMID: 16837525
-
Searching for three-dimensional secondary structural patterns in proteins with ProSMoS.Bioinformatics. 2007 Jun 1;23(11):1331-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm121. Epub 2007 Mar 24. Bioinformatics. 2007. PMID: 17384423
-
An introduction to modeling structure from sequence.Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct;Chapter 5:Unit 5.1. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0501s15. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2006. PMID: 18428765 Review.
-
Predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes.Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2008 Apr;9(2):57-66. doi: 10.2174/138920108783955209. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2008. PMID: 18393862 Review.
Cited by
-
Reducing the dimensionality of the protein-folding search problem.Protein Sci. 2012 Aug;21(8):1231-40. doi: 10.1002/pro.2106. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Protein Sci. 2012. PMID: 22692765 Free PMC article.
-
Biological insights from topology independent comparison of protein 3D structures.Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Aug;39(14):e94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr348. Epub 2011 May 19. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011. PMID: 21596786 Free PMC article.
-
Structural alphabets for protein structure classification: a comparison study.J Mol Biol. 2009 Mar 27;387(2):431-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.044. Epub 2008 Dec 25. J Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19135454 Free PMC article.
-
iPBA: a tool for protein structure comparison using sequence alignment strategies.Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jul;39(Web Server issue):W18-23. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr333. Epub 2011 May 17. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011. PMID: 21586582 Free PMC article.
-
Conformation-independent structural comparison of macromolecules with ProSMART.Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2014 Sep;70(Pt 9):2487-99. doi: 10.1107/S1399004714016241. Epub 2014 Aug 29. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2014. PMID: 25195761 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources