Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar 23;282(12):9150-61.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609304200. Epub 2007 Jan 21.

Pyrimethamine as a potential pharmacological chaperone for late-onset forms of GM2 gangliosidosis

Affiliations

Pyrimethamine as a potential pharmacological chaperone for late-onset forms of GM2 gangliosidosis

Gustavo H B Maegawa et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Late-onset GM2 gangliosidosis is composed of two related, autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative diseases, both resulting from deficiency of lysosomal, heterodimeric beta-hexosaminidase A (Hex A, alphabeta). Pharmacological chaperones (PC) are small molecules that can stabilize the conformation of a mutant protein, allowing it to pass the quality control system of the endoplasmic reticulum. To date all successful PCs have also been competitive inhibitors. Screening for Hex A inhibitors in a library of 1040 Food Drug Administration-approved compounds identified pyrimethamine (PYR (2,4-diamino 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-ethylpyrimidine)) as the most potent inhibitor. Cell lines from 10 late-onset Tay-Sachs (11 alpha-mutations, 2 novel) and 7 Sandhoff (9 beta-mutations, 4 novel) disease patients, were cultured with PYR at concentrations corresponding to therapeutic doses. Cells carrying the most common late-onset mutation, alphaG269S, showed significant increases in residual Hex A activity, as did all 7 of the beta-mutants tested. Cells responding to PC treatment included those carrying mutants resulting in reduced Hex heat stability and partial splice junction mutations of the inherently less stable alpha-subunit. PYR, which binds to the active site in domain II, was able to function as PC even to domain I beta-mutants. We concluded that PYR functions as a mutation-specific PC, variably enhancing residual lysosomal Hex A levels in late-onset GM2 gangliosidosis patient cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Replicate plot of a screen of the NINDS FDA-approved library of 1,040 small molecules for Hex A inhibitors. The graphic represents a replicate plot of residual Hex A activity in the presence of individual compounds from the NINDS library, i.e. each set of replicates define an X,Y coordinate. The zone outlined (dashed line) at 40% was set as the “inhibitor compound area,” which contained 4 compounds.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A, B) Characterization of two inhibitors identified in the screen. The IC50 curves for the two “hits”, PYR (A) and thioguanine (TGN, B). (C) PYR behaves kinetically as a classical competitive inhibitor of Hex. (D) Maximal inhibition of Hex A by PYR was at pH 6.5, while the transition state analog, NGT, showed a maximum inhibition at pH of 4.5.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PYR enhances Hex A enzyme levels in some TSD patient cell lines. Two mutant TSD fibroblast cell lines, αG269S/IVS6+1G>A (A) and αR178H/R178H (B), were treated with PYR and NGT, at 20, 10 and 5 μg/mL, dissolved in DMSO. Hex A activities using MUGS as a substrate were determined. The relative fold-increase of Hex A activity was calculated based on the activity of cell lines treated only with DMSO. The mature (lysosomal) α-subunit protein levels seen in Western blots (beneath histograms) correlated with the relative increase of Hex A observed in the αG269S/IVS6+1G>A mutant (A). However, the cells containing the αR178H/R178H active site mutations failed to show any increases in relative Hex A activity or changes in α-subunit protein levels (B). αp, indicates the α-subunit precursor, αm, the mature lysosomal α-subunit. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Specificity of PYR as a PC for Hex A. Relative levels of MU-substrate hydrolysis by acid phosphatase (AcPhos, substrate MUP), Hex A (substrate, MUGS) and βGal (substrate, MUβGal) in one of TSD cell lines, αG269S/c1278insTACT, incubated with increasing concentrations of PYR (units mM).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Missense mutations identified in TSD and SD patients localized onto a three-dimensional Hex A ribbon diagram (2). Aminoacid residue alterations are highlighted in color and shown in a space filled format. Two novel mutations (βC137Y and βT150P) are located in domain I (βA50-P201; light gray) of the β-subunit (blue). NGT is shown as a red stick format bound in the active site of the α-subunit (cyan).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
TSD or α-mutants cell lines which responded to PYR and NGT. The αG269S/c1278insTACT (A) and the αIVS9+1G>A/IVS8-7G>A (B) are shown with their relative Hex A activity and α-subunit protein levels at different treatment regimens of PYR and NGT. The fold-increase in activities was calculated based on the activity measured in control cell lines treated only with the dissolvent, i.e. ETOH for PYR-treated and H2O, for NGT-treated cells (in Methods). αp, indicates the α-subunit precursor, αm, the mature, lysosomal α-subunit. *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Some TSD or α-mutants showed no relative increase in residual Hex A activity when exposed to PYR. PYR-treatment had no effect on cell lines containing αR499H, αR499C and αR178H mutations. The αR499H/c.1278insTACT mutant cell line (A) and αR178H/c.1510delC (B) are shown here in order to illustrate this observation. αp, indicates the α-subunit precursor, αm, the mature lysosomal α-subunit in Western blots.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
PYR increases the enzyme activity and protein level of the α and β subunits of Hex A in the βR505Q/Δ16kb cell line. Histograms show relative activity enhancement of the lysate (total Hex A and S), as well as Hex A and S separated by IP (Methods). Western blots of the samples treated with PYR and NGT also document an increase in protein levels of the mature, lysosomal α- and β– subunits in the total lysate of treated cells. α/βp, indicates the α-and β-subunit precursors; αm and βm indicate the mature (lysosomal) α- and β-subunits, respectively. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Cellular localization of the mutant β-subunit-containing Hex isozymes in a patient fibroblast cell line, βR505Q/IVS11+5G>A. Cells were grown in the presence of PYR (3.0 μg/mL; A-F) or the solvent (ETOH) alone (control; G-L). The images in panels D-F represent selected areas of the same cell seen in panels A-C, but with higher magnification in order to demonstrate co-localization of the β-subunit of Hex (soluble protein in the lysosomal lumen) and Lamp-1 (integral lysosomal membrane protein) in lysosomes, versus the control cell, (G-I and J-L at higher magnification). Scale bars, red (10 μm) and magenta (2 μm).
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Natural and artificial substrate activities are increased in a αG269S mutant TSD cell line grown in the presence of PYR (3 μg/mL). The level of Hex-enhancement as measured by natural substrate, 3[H]-GM2 ganglioside and recombinant Activator (gray bars), hydrolysis was similar to that observed with the α-active-site-specific artificial substrate, MUGS (white bars).
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Effects of growth in PYR on the levels of monomeric and dimeric subunits of Hex; (A) Western blots from a normal, an α-G296S/null and a βR505Q/Δ16kb mutant cell line grown with or without PYR in their media. (B) Log scale of the percentage of remaining Hex A activity from βR505Q/Δ16kb mutant cell lysate exposed to PYR or solvent (ETOH) over a course of 30 minutes at 37°C.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hirabayashi Y, Li YT, Li SC. J Neurochem. 1983;40(1):168–175. - PubMed
    1. Lemieux MJ, Mark BL, Cherney MM, Withers SG, Mahuran DJ, James MN. J Mol Biol. 2006;359(4):913–929. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mark BL, Mahuran DJ, Cherney MM, Zhao D, Knapp S, James MN. J Mol Biol. 2003;327(5):1093–1109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma R, Bukovac S, Callahan J, Mahuran D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1637(1):113–118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hou Y, Tse R, Mahuran DJ. Biochemistry. 1996;35:3963–3969. - PubMed

Publication types