How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study
- PMID: 17238219
- DOI: 10.1002/pd.1656
How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the level of information and informed consent for maternal serum screening (MSS) for Down syndrome (DS) in the second trimester of pregnancy and analyse the exercise of autonomy towards the test by the women concerned.
Methods: We studied the population of pregnant women attending obstetric consultations in two French hospitals over a 3-month period. The women were assigned to three groups according to MSS results for DS: women at high risk of having a child with DS (group 1), women at low risk (group 2) and women who did not undergo the test (group 3). A questionnaire was completed before the medical consultation, to assess the quality of consent before amniocentesis for the group at high risk and before the second-trimester ultrasound scan for the other two groups.
Results: We analysed 305 questionnaires for 89, 137 and 79 women belonging to groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. In total, 123 women (40.3% [IC 95%, 35-46%]) were considered to be well informed; 33 (10%, [IC 95%, 8-12%]) had a high level of knowledge, but made choices not consistent with their stated attitude, and 149 (49.7% [IC 95%, 45-56%]) were considered uninformed. Logistic regression analysis showed that maternal consent depended on three independent components: The score attributed to the doctor for information about MSS (t = 4.216, p < 0.001). Whether the patient belonged to group 1 (t = -2.631, p < 0.009). Educational level (< high-school diploma, high-school diploma or at least two years of higher education after high school) (t = 2.324, p < 0.02). The rate of consent increased with educational level and was highest for the women in group 1 and for those whose doctor had a high information score.
Conclusions: Our findings clearly show that women are provided with insufficient information concerning MSS screening for DS in the second trimester of pregnancy for real and valid consent to be obtained.
Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
What about informed consent in first-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome?Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;23(3):173-84. doi: 10.1159/000116738. Epub 2008 Feb 20. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008. PMID: 18417975
-
Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results.Womens Health Issues. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.10.003. Epub 2008 Jan 4. Womens Health Issues. 2008. PMID: 18180167 Clinical Trial.
-
Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome.Prenat Diagn. 2005 Aug;25(8):656-64. doi: 10.1002/pd.1218. Prenat Diagn. 2005. PMID: 16049990
-
Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(12):1420-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340600985198. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006. PMID: 17260215 Review.
-
Antenatal screening for Down syndrome.Prog Clin Biol Res. 1995;393:27-42. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1995. PMID: 8545455 Review.
Cited by
-
Best ethical practices for clinicians and laboratories in the provision of noninvasive prenatal testing.Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jul;33(7):656-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.4144. Epub 2013 May 21. Prenat Diagn. 2013. PMID: 23613322 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.J Clin Med. 2014 Apr 8;3(2):388-415. doi: 10.3390/jcm3020388. J Clin Med. 2014. PMID: 26237381 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context.Hum Reprod. 2012 Nov;27(11):3123-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des286. Epub 2012 Aug 3. Hum Reprod. 2012. PMID: 22863603 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Jan 16;7:113-26. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S67124. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 25653560 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Knowledge was clearly associated with education." epistemic positioning in the context of informed choice: a scoping review and secondary qualitative analysis.BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 9;26(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01144-7. BMC Med Ethics. 2025. PMID: 39789516 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical