Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Jan;3(1):e9.
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030009.

Neutralizing antibody fails to impact the course of Ebola virus infection in monkeys

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Neutralizing antibody fails to impact the course of Ebola virus infection in monkeys

Wendelien B Oswald et al. PLoS Pathog. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Prophylaxis with high doses of neutralizing antibody typically offers protection against challenge with viruses producing acute infections. In this study, we have investigated the ability of the neutralizing human monoclonal antibody, KZ52, to protect against Ebola virus in rhesus macaques. This antibody was previously shown to fully protect guinea pigs from infection. Four rhesus macaques were given 50 mg/kg of neutralizing human monoclonal antibody KZ52 intravenously 1 d before challenge with 1,000 plaque-forming units of Ebola virus, followed by a second dose of 50 mg/kg antibody 4 d after challenge. A control animal was exposed to virus in the absence of antibody treatment. Passive transfer of the neutralizing human monoclonal antibody not only failed to protect macaques against challenge with Ebola virus but also had a minimal effect on the explosive viral replication following infection. We show that the inability of antibody to impact infection was not due to neutralization escape. It appears that Ebola virus has a mechanism of infection propagation in vivo in macaques that is uniquely insensitive even to high concentrations of neutralizing antibody.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plasma Viremia in Macaques Challenged with ZEBOV
Shown is the measured viremia, in log10 pfu per ml, for four antibody-treated monkeys (CH46, CH56, CH57, and CH83) and one untreated control animal (EHD) at days 4, 7, 9, and 10 in plasma by plaque assay as described in Materials and Methods. 50 mg/kg of KZ52 IgG1 human antibody [11] was given intravenously to four rhesus macaques 1 d before and again 4 d after challenge with 1,000 pfu (intramusculary) of the 1995 ZEBOV (Kikwit) isolate. Ab, antibody.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A Large Immunoreactive Monocyte Is Observed in a Blood Vessel in the Kidney of Monkey CH57 Postmortem
Similar cells were observed in analysis of monkeys CH83 and CH56. Typically smaller immunoreactive monocytes are seen with ZEBOV infection [15]. Immunohistochemistry was performed as described in Materials and Methods.

References

    1. Casadevall A, Scharff MD. Return to the past: The case for antibody-based therapies in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:150–161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parren PW, Burton DR. The antiviral activity of antibodies in vitro and in vivo. Advan Immunol. 2001;77:195–262. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hangartner L, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H. Antiviral antibody responses: The two extremes of a wide spectrum. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:231–243. - PubMed
    1. Guillaume V, Contamin H, Loth P, Grosjean I, Courbot MC, et al. Antibody prophylaxis and therapy against Nipah virus infection in hamsters. J Virol. 2006;80:1972–1978. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seiler P, Brundler MA, Zimmermann C, Weibel D, Bruns M, et al. Induction of protective cytotoxic T-cell responses in the presence of high titers of virus-neutralizing antibodies: Implications for passive and active immunization. J Exp Med. 1998;187:649–654. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances