Results after change of treatment policy for rectal cancer--report from a single hospital in China
- PMID: 17240113
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.12.011
Results after change of treatment policy for rectal cancer--report from a single hospital in China
Abstract
Background: Great changes have occurred in the management of rectal cancer. This study presents the outcome of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer in a single Chinese institution and evaluates TME's role in the comprehensive management of rectal cancer.
Methods: We reviewed the data of rectal cancer patients surgically treated by three colorectal surgeons from January 2000 to August 2004. Patients who received surgical resection for rectal cancer from January 1996 to December 1999, before the introduction of TME, were chosen as controls. Data regarding characteristics of patients and tumors, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and results of follow-up were collected for analysis.
Results: Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with rectal cancer were enrolled in our study, with 175 patients in the TME group and 202 as controls. Mortality and morbidity rates were 1% and 14% in TME patients and 1% and 31% in controls, respectively. The TME group had a shorter operation time and hospital stay, and less bleeding, wound and urinary complications. The local recurrence (LR) rate was 6% and 12% in the TME and the control groups, respectively (P<0.05). With a median follow-up of 35 months, the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 66%. Consistent with the univariate analysis result, multivariate analysis demonstrated that TNM stage, tumor grade, age, and surgeons were independent prognostic factors. TME was not an independent prognostic factor for patients' survival.
Conclusions: TME is a safe and efficient option in reducing LR. However, it is not an independent predictor for patients' survival. In addition to the standardized usage of TME, further knowledge on the molecular mechanism of cancer is needed.
Similar articles
-
[Effect of total mesorectal excision and preoperative chemoradiotherapy on local recurrence in rectal cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 May;9(3):207-9. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16721678 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.Br J Surg. 2002 Sep;89(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02196.x. Br J Surg. 2002. PMID: 12190680 Clinical Trial.
-
Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):808-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01256.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18. Colorectal Dis. 2007. PMID: 17441969
-
Total mesorectal excision for middle and lower rectal cancer: a single institution experience with 337 consecutive patients.J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;86(3):115-21. doi: 10.1002/jso.20062. J Surg Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15170648 Review.
-
[Current problems of the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of the literature and personal experience].Chir Ital. 2001 Jul-Aug;53(4):543-9. Chir Ital. 2001. PMID: 11586574 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Long-term outcomes after extra-levator versus conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 22;22(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01692-y. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 35733206 Free PMC article.
-
Experience of participating in national home-based medical care project for cancer patients with a temporary stoma: a qualitative study.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 2;33(6):525. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09557-9. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40455333 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of continuous care on health outcomes in patients with stoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 25;9(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.006. eCollection 2022 Jan. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021. PMID: 35528792 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources