Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Jan;33(1 Spec No.):S37-43.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32330.x.

Pilot study comparing the diffusion of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A in patients with forehead hyperhidrosis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pilot study comparing the diffusion of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A in patients with forehead hyperhidrosis

Ada R Trindade de Almeida et al. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Different formulations of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) may have different diffusion characteristics.

Objective: The objective was to compare the diffusion characteristics of two formulations of BoNTA.

Materials and methods: A total of 20 patients with forehead hyperhidrosis received four injections of BoNTA in their forehead (one medial and lateral injection of one formulation randomly assigned to one forehead side, one medial and lateral injection of the other formulation to the other forehead side). Patients received 3 U/injection of BoNTA(1) (BOTOX, Allergan, Inc.) and were randomly assigned to receive BoNTA(2) (Dysport, Ipsen Ltd.) at a dose ratio of 1:2.5, 1:3, or 1:4. The area of anhidrosis was highlighted using iodine and starch and determined by software from standardized photography.

Results: During the 6 months after treatment, the area of anhidrosis was larger with BoNTA(2) in 93% (195/210) of medial-medial or lateral-lateral comparisons of the two products and at all dose ratios. The smaller area of anhidrosis with BoNTA(1) did not compromise its efficacy in inhibiting contraction of frontalis muscle.

Conclusion: BoNTA(2) has a greater area of diffusion in the forehead than BoNTA(1), even with identical injection volumes. This may hinder accurate localization of clinical effect, thereby increasing the potential for adverse effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances