Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Feb;104(2):378-83.
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253501.07183.2a.

A phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study of Eritoran (E5564), a lipid A antagonist, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study of Eritoran (E5564), a lipid A antagonist, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Elliott Bennett-Guerrero et al. Anesth Analg. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Lipid A, the toxic moiety of endotoxin, is linked to multiple complications after cardiac surgery, including fever, vasodilation, and pulmonary and renal dysfunction. The lipid A antagonist eritoran (or E5564) prevents endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation in animals and humans. In this study we assessed the safety of eritoran administration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and obtained preliminary efficacy data for the prophylaxis of endotoxin-mediated surgical complications.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, ascending-dose, placebo-controlled study was conducted at nine hospitals. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or cardiac valvular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled. Patients received a 4-h infusion of placebo (n = 78) vs 2 mg (n = 24), 12 mg (n = 26), or 28 mg (n = 24) of eritoran initiated approximately 1 h before cardiopulmonary bypass.

Results: No significant safety concerns were identified with continuous safety monitoring, and enrollment continued to the highest prespecified dose (28 mg). No statistically significant differences were observed in most variables related to systemic inflammation or organ dysfunction/injury.

Conclusions: This Phase II safety study suggests that the administration of the novel lipid A antagonist, eritoran, is not associated with overt toxicity in cardiac surgical patients. Blocking lipid A with eritoran does not appear to confer any clear benefit to elective cardiac surgical patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources