Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan;57(534):7-14.

Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases

Kelvin Jordan  1 , Alexandra M Clarke, Deborah P M Symmons, Douglas Fleming, Mark Porcheret, Umesh T Kadam, Peter Croft
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases

Kelvin Jordan et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Primary care consultation data are an important source of information on morbidity prevalence. It is not known how reliable such figures are.

Aim: To compare annual consultation prevalence estimates for musculoskeletal conditions derived from four general practice consultation databases.

Design of study: Retrospective study of general practice consultation records.

Setting: Three national general practice consultation databases: i) Fourth Morbidity Statistics from General Practice (MSGP4, 1991/92), ii) Royal College of General Practitioners Weekly Returns Service (RCGP WRS, 2001), and iii) General Practice Research Database (GPRD, 1991 and 2001); and one regional database (Consultations in Primary Care Archive, 2001).

Method: Age-sex standardized persons consulting annual prevalence rates for musculoskeletal conditions overall, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and arthralgia were derived for patients aged 15 years and over.

Results: GPRD prevalence of any musculoskeletal condition, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis was lower than that of the other databases. This is likely to be due to GPs not needing to record every consultation made for a chronic condition. MSGP4 gave the highest prevalence for osteoarthritis but low prevalence of arthralgia which reflects encouragement for GPs to use diagnostic rather than symptom codes.

Conclusion: Considerable variation exists in consultation prevalence estimates for musculoskeletal conditions. Researchers and health service planners should be aware that estimates of disease occurrence based on consultation will be influenced by choice of database. This is likely to be true for other chronic diseases and where alternative symptom labels exist for a disease. RCGP WRS may give the most reliable prevalence figures for musculoskeletal and other chronic diseases.

Keywords: consultation and referral; databases; musculoskeletal disease; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age-specific persons consulting prevalence rate of musculoskeletal conditions per 10 000 people aged ≥15 years.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Age-specific persons consulting prevalence rate of osteoarthritis per 10 000 people aged ≥15 years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Age-specific persons consulting prevalence rate of arthralgia per 10 000 people aged ≥15 years.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jordan K, Porcheret M, Croft P. Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2004;21(4):396–412. - PubMed
    1. Majeed A. Sources, uses, strengths and limitations of data collected in primary care in England. Health Stat Q. 2004;21:5–14. - PubMed
    1. De Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract. 2005;23(2):253–263. - PubMed
    1. McCormick A, Fleming D, Charlton J. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice: Fourth national study 1991–1992. London: HMSO; 1995.
    1. Wallace H, Shorvon S, Tallis R. Age-specific incidence and prevalence rates of treated epilepsy in an unselected population of 2,052,922 and age-specific fertility rates of women with epilepsy. Lancet. 1998;352(9145):1970–1973. - PubMed

Publication types