Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Jan;57(534):23-8.

Management of acute neck pain in general practice: a prospective study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Management of acute neck pain in general practice: a prospective study

Cees Vos et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Research on neck pain in primary care is sparse. The role of GPs in taking care of patients with neck pain has not been described so far. This study focused on interested in the interaction between patients and GPs in their first contact on a new episode of neck pain.

Aim: To describe GPs' management of acute neck pain in patients and to detail the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures undertaken by GPs and self-care by patients.

Design of study: A prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up.

Setting: General practice in The Netherlands.

Method: Patients consulting their GP for non-specific acute neck pain lasting no longer than 6 weeks were invited to participate. Questionnaires were collected from patients at baseline and after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. Patients rated their recovery on a 7-point ordinal scale.

Results: In total 187 patients were included. At baseline GPs prescribed medication for 42% of patients, mostly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (56%) or muscle relaxation medication (20%); 51% were referred to a physiotherapist. Seventy-four per cent of referred patients reported recovery at the end of the follow-up year, whereas 79% of non-referred patients reported recovery. Frequently-given advice by the GP was to 'wait and see' (23%), 'improve posture' and 'stay active' (22%) or to 'take a rest' (18%). Self-care by patients included different sources of heat application (79%) and exercises (57%). Complementary medicine was used in 12% of cases and 39% of patients visited their GP again during follow up. Consultation of a medical specialist and ordering of X-rays rarely occurred.

Conclusion: Management by GPs included a strategy to 'wait and see' for an expected favourable natural course supported by medication, or referral to a physiotherapist.

Keywords: consultation and referral; duty to follow-up; family practice; neck pain; practice management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Binder A, Neck pain. Clin Evidence. 2006;15:1654–75. - PubMed
    1. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998;23:1689–1698. - PubMed
    1. Donk van der J, Schouten JSAG, Passchier J, et al. The associations of neck pain with radiological abnormalities of the cervical spine and personality traits in a general population. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:1884–1889. - PubMed
    1. Hagen KB, Bjørndal A, Uhlig T, Kvien TK. A population study of factors associated with general practitioner consultation for non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59:788–793. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Picavet HSJ, Schouten JSAG. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study. Pain. 2003;102:167–178. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances