Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics
- PMID: 17245209
- DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225631.07039.6d
Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics
Abstract
Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive esophagitis are the main presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, NERD is the most common presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease in community-based patients. Patients with NERD differ in demographic characteristics from patients with erosive esophagitis, primarily in sex distribution, weight/body mass index, and prevalence of hiatal hernia. Physiologically, patients with NERD tend to have normal lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure, minimal esophageal body motility abnormalities, low esophageal acid exposure profile and minimal nighttime esophageal acid exposure. Patients with NERD have a lower symptom response rate to proton pump inhibitor once daily than patients with erosive esophagitis. Additionally, NERD patients demonstrate a longer lag-time for symptom resolution and lack of difference in symptom response rate between half to full dose proton pump inhibitor as compared with patients with erosive esophagitis.
Similar articles
-
Nonerosive reflux disease.Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2007 Jun;53(2):127-41. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2007. PMID: 17557041 Review.
-
Non-erosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux diseases: No difference with regard to reflux pattern and motility abnormalities.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(7):794-800. doi: 10.1080/00365520801908928. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18584517
-
Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility and hyperactive acid sensitization in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;22(10):1662-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04987.x. Epub 2007 Jun 7. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17559356
-
Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jun;5(6):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.023. Epub 2007 May 4. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17481961
-
Precise role of acid in non-erosive reflux disease.Digestion. 2008;78 Suppl 1:31-41. doi: 10.1159/000151253. Epub 2008 Oct 2. Digestion. 2008. PMID: 18832838 Review.
Cited by
-
Bridge Swallowing Exercise for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms: A Pilot Study.Prog Rehabil Med. 2022 Oct 8;7:20220054. doi: 10.2490/prm.20220054. eCollection 2022. Prog Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID: 36311470 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative Treatments for Minor GI Ailments.Innov Pharm. 2019 Jul 5;10(3):10.24926/iip.v10i3.1659. doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i3.1659. eCollection 2019. Innov Pharm. 2019. Retraction in: Innov Pharm. 2020 Feb 25;11(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v11i1.3940. PMID: 34007566 Free PMC article. Retracted. Review.
-
Some of the effective factors in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.J Cell Mol Med. 2018 Dec;22(12):6401-6404. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13939. Epub 2018 Oct 15. J Cell Mol Med. 2018. PMID: 30320456 Free PMC article.
-
Antireflux surgery is equally beneficial in nonerosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Aug;95(2):94-99. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.2.94. Epub 2017 Jul 30. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018. PMID: 30079326 Free PMC article.
-
Association of esophageal inflammation, obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease: from FDG PET/CT perspective.PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e92001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092001. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24642729 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical