Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jul;113(3):589-600.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.3.589.

Biparental Inheritance of Non-Mendelian Gene Markers in CHLAMYDOMONAS MOEWUSII

Affiliations

Biparental Inheritance of Non-Mendelian Gene Markers in CHLAMYDOMONAS MOEWUSII

R W Lee et al. Genetics. 1986 Jul.

Abstract

The first two non-Mendelian gene mutations to be identified in Chlamydomonas moewusii are described. These putative chloroplast gene mutations include one for resistance to streptomycin (sr-nM1) and one for resistance to erythromycin (er-nM1). In one- and two-factor reciprocal crosses, usually over 90% of the germinating zygospores transmitted these mutations and their wild-type alternatives from both parents (biparental zygospores); the remaining zygospores transmitted exclusively the non-Mendelian markers of the mating-type "plus" parent. Among the biparental zygospores, a strong bias in the transmission of non-Mendelian alleles from the mating-type "plus" parent was indicated by an excess of meiotic and postmeiotic mitotic progeny that were homoplasmic for non-Mendelian alleles from this parent compared to those that were homoplasmic for the non-Mendelian alleles from the mating-type "minus" parent. At best, weak linkage was detected between the sr-nM1 and er-nM1 loci. Non-Mendelian, chloroplast gene markers in Chlamydomonas eugametos and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii showed a predominantly uniparental mode of transmission from the mating-type "plus" parent in crosses performed under the same conditions used for the C. moewusii crosses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mutat Res. 1976 Nov;37(2-3):221-8 - PubMed
    1. Adv Genet. 1977;19:287-340 - PubMed
    1. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1972 Sep;1(6):599-600 - PubMed