A Comparison of Heat and Interchromosomal Effects on Recombination and Interference in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
- PMID: 17248833
- PMCID: PMC1213832
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/89.1.65
A Comparison of Heat and Interchromosomal Effects on Recombination and Interference in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Abstract
Heat and interchromosomal effects on recombination have been compared for 23 regions comprising the predominantly euchromatic portions of the five arms of the Drosophila genome. Patterns of response are strikingly similar, with both modifiers causing proximal and distal increases and minimal effects in the middle of the arms. Changes in interference for the same regions in the presence of the two modifiers reveal little similarity, except for the X chromosome. The question of independent control of interference and recombination, as well as alternatives for their temporal sequence, is discussed. Recombination response to the two modifiers in the centric heterochromatin of chromosoaime 2 is markedly different from that found in euchromatin. The interchromosomal effect is absent here, whereas heat induces an increase roughly an order of magnitude greater than that found in euchromatin and totally unlike the lack of response in the proximal heterochromatin of the X chromosome. It is proposed that the sequestering of DNA satellite I (thermal dissociation 9-20 degrees lower than that of the other major satellites) in the centromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 (but not in X or 3) may account for the increase.
Similar articles
-
Interchromosomal effects of heterochromatic deletions on recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1979 Oct;93(2):437-48. doi: 10.1093/genetics/93.2.437. Genetics. 1979. PMID: 119672 Free PMC article.
-
Meiotic recombination is suppressed near the histone-defined border of euchromatin and heterochromatin on chromosome 2L of Drosophila melanogaster.Genome. 2016 Apr;59(4):289-94. doi: 10.1139/gen-2015-0171. Genome. 2016. PMID: 27031007
-
Mapping of the juxtacentromeric heterochromatin-euchromatin frontier of human chromosome 21.Genome Res. 2006 Oct;16(10):1198-207. doi: 10.1101/gr.5440306. Epub 2006 Sep 8. Genome Res. 2006. PMID: 16963709 Free PMC article.
-
[Distorted heterochromatin replication in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes as a result of euchromatin-heterochromatin rearrangements].Genetika. 2007 Jan;43(1):18-26. Genetika. 2007. PMID: 17333934 Review. Russian.
-
On the roles of heterochromatin and euchromatin in meiosis in drosophila: mapping chromosomal pairing sites and testing candidate mutations for effects on X-Y nondisjunction and meiotic drive in male meiosis.Genetica. 2000;109(1-2):77-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1026536200594. Genetica. 2000. PMID: 11293799 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of co-evolution with a parasite, Nosema whitei, and population size on recombination rates and fitness in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.Genetica. 2010 Jul;138(7):737-44. doi: 10.1007/s10709-010-9454-z. Epub 2010 Apr 11. Genetica. 2010. PMID: 20383780
-
On the evolutionary advantage of fitness-associated recombination.Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2167-79. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2167. Genetics. 2003. PMID: 14704195 Free PMC article.
-
Recombination rate plasticity: revealing mechanisms by design.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;372(1736):20160459. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0459. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017. PMID: 29109222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seasonal changes in recombination characteristics in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.Heredity (Edinb). 2021 Sep;127(3):278-287. doi: 10.1038/s41437-021-00449-2. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Heredity (Edinb). 2021. PMID: 34163036 Free PMC article.
-
Further studies on the interchromosomal effect on crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster affecting the preconditions of exchange.Genetica. 1990;82(3):203-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00056363. Genetica. 1990. PMID: 2128630
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases