Partial Dominance of Ems-Induced Mutations Affecting Viability in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
- PMID: 17248838
- PMCID: PMC1213840
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/89.2.315
Partial Dominance of Ems-Induced Mutations Affecting Viability in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Abstract
More than 700 EMS-treated second chromosomes marked with either cn (cinnabar) or bw (brown), and derived from long-inbred stocks, were measured for their heterozygous effects on viability in both isogenic (homozygous) and nonisogenic (heterozygous) backgrounds. Each test was replicated five times. When the background was homozygous, flies heterozygous for a treated chromosome were an average of 2.1% less viable, per 0.005 m EMS, than flies heterozygous for an untreated chromosome. Classified according to their homogous effect in an accompanying series of crosses, the lethal-bearing chromosomes (L), which carry genes of less drastic effects as well, reduced the viability of their heterozygous carriers by 3.3%, severe detrimentals (D(s)) by 2.2%, and mild detrimentals (D(m)) by 1.2% at this dose. In the heterozygous background, the mean heterozygous disadvantage for the entire group was 1%, or about half as large.--When computed separately for each count from a single mating, the heterozygous disadvantage was consistently greatest for the earliest counts (4.8%), next highest for the middle count (0.8%), and lowest in the latest count (0.5%), in the homozygous background, indicating that mutant heterozygotes were delayed in time of emergence. The figures in the heterozygous background were, again, reduced, but in the same direction.-The relative viability disadvantage of the cn marker was about 2(1/2) times greater in the homozygous than in the heterozygous background, further supporting the conclusion that the homozygous background can accentuate differences. The enhancement of treatment and marker effects could be a direct result of the level of background heterozygosity per se or attributable to the reduced vigor of the inbred strain.-Dominance, a measure of the heterozygous effect of a mutant relative to its homozygous effect, is greater for genes with small homozygous disadvantage than for more drastic genes. In the homozygous background the average dominance for lethals was 0.019 in contrast to 0.183 for mild detrimentals, supporting other published results suggesting that genes with milder effect, because they occur more frequently, have a greater impact on a population.-The homozygous D:L ratio of EMS mutations was 0.266 and the D(m): L ratio, 0.092, which are lower than comparable load ratios for spontaneous mutations, but greater than for X-ray induced mutations.
Similar articles
-
Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):529-45. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.529. Genetics. 1977. PMID: 200526 Free PMC article.
-
Heterozygous effects on fitness of EMS-treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):575-90. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.575. Genetics. 1978. PMID: 205482 Free PMC article.
-
Heterozygous effects of irradiated chromosomes on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1976 Oct;84(2):353-74. doi: 10.1093/genetics/84.2.353. Genetics. 1976. PMID: 826450 Free PMC article.
-
Fitness effects of EMS-induced mutations on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Viability effects and heterozygous fitness effects.Genetics. 1977 Dec;87(4):763-74. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.4.763. Genetics. 1977. PMID: 414960 Free PMC article.
-
Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335-55. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. Genetics. 1972. PMID: 4630587 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2003 Apr;163(4):1357-64. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1357. Genetics. 2003. PMID: 12702680 Free PMC article.
-
Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics. 2003 Oct;165(2):589-99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.2.589. Genetics. 2003. PMID: 14573472 Free PMC article.
-
James F. Crow: storied teacher, leader, and colleague at the University of Wisconsin.Genetics. 2012 May;191(1):1-5. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140657. Genetics. 2012. PMID: 22555440 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases