Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr 2;87(1):9-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2006.12.004. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

Site-directed photoproteolysis of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) by specific porphyrin-protein probe conjugates: a strategy to improve the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy for cancer

Affiliations

Site-directed photoproteolysis of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) by specific porphyrin-protein probe conjugates: a strategy to improve the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy for cancer

Kimberly A Conlon et al. J Photochem Photobiol B. .

Abstract

The specific light-induced, non-enzymatic photolysis of mOGG1 by porphyrin-conjugated or rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin and porphyrin-conjugated or rose bengal-conjugated first specific or secondary anti-IgG antibodies is reported. The porphyrin chlorin e6 and rose bengal were conjugated to either streptavidin, rabbit anti-mOGG1 primary specific antibody fractions or goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody fractions. Under our experimental conditions, visible light of wavelengths greater than 600 nm induced the non-enzymatic degradation of mOGG1 when this DNA repair enzyme either directly formed a complex with chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 primary specific antibodies or indirectly formed complexes with either streptavidin-chlorin e6 conjugates and biotinylated first specific anti-mOGG1 antibodies or first specific anti-mOGG1 antibodies and chlorin e6-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies. Similar results were obtained when rose bengal was used as photosensitizer instead of chlorin e6. The rate of the photochemical reaction of mOGG1 site-directed by all three chlorin e6 antibody complexes was not affected by the presence of the singlet oxygen scavenger sodium azide. Site-directed photoactivatable probes having the capacity to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) while destroying the DNA repair system in malignant cells and tumors may represent a powerful strategy to boost selectivity, penetration and efficacy of current photodynamic (PDT) therapy methodologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Photolysis of mOGG1 by first specific porphyrin-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antiserum (direct method)
Recombinant purified mOGG1 was reacted with either chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies or pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies in the presence of visible light as described in Materials and Methods. All irradiations were conducted at 25°C for 30 min. Each lane of a 7.5–15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel was loaded with 10 μl of reaction mixture. Gels were stained overnight with Coomassie blue. Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:20. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:50. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:20. Lane 4, mOGG1 photolyzed with pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:50. Lane 5, unphotolyzed mOGG1 (Molecular mass/Gel migration standard).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Photolysis of mOGG1 by anti-mOGG1 first specific rabbit IgG fractions either conjugated to porphyrin or rose bengal (direct method)
MOGG1 was reacted with chlorin e6, pyropheophorbide-a or rose bengal-conjugated anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions in the presence of visible light as described in Materials and Methods. All irradiations were conducted at 25°C for 30 min. Each lane of a 7.5–15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel was loaded with 10 μl of reaction mixture. Gels were stained overnight with Coomassie blue. (A) Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:100. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:1000. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with rose bengal-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:100. Lane 4, mOGG1 photolyzed with rose bengal-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:1,000. (B) Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:10. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:100. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:1,000. Lane 4, mOGG1 photolyzed with pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:10,000. (A, B) Lane 5, unphotolyzed mOGG1 (Molecular mass/Gel migration standard).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Photolysis of mOGG1 by either first specific anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions or anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies conjugated to porphyrins
MOGG1 was incubated with chlorin e6 or pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions (direct method) or with a mixture containing unconjugated anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions and either chlorin e6 or pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (indirect method) in the presence or absence of visible light as described in Materials and Methods. All irradiations were conducted at 25°C for 30 min. Each lane of a 7.5–15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel was loaded with 10 μl of reaction mixture. Gels were stained overnight with Coomassie blue. (A) Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with 1 μl chlorin e6-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with 1 μl unconjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:50 and 1 μl chlorin e6-conjugated secondary antibodies. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with 1 μl pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies. Lane 4, mOGG1 photolyzed with 1 μl unconjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:50 and 1 μl pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated secondary antibodies. (B) Lanes 1–4 are as in A, unirradiated (dark controls). (A,B) Lane 5, unphotolyzed mOGG1 (Molecular mass/Gel migration standard).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Photolysis of mOGG1 by chlorin e6-conjugated secondary antibodies (indirect method) in the presence and absence of sodium azide
MOGG1 was incubated with a mixture containing unconjugated anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions and chlorin e6-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies in the presence or absence of sodium azide in the presence of visible light as described in Materials and Methods. All irradiations were conducted at 25°C for 30 min. Each lane of a 7.5–15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel was loaded with 10 μl of reaction mixture. Gels were stained overnight with Coomassie blue. First specific anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions were diluted 1:500 and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies were diluted 1:10. Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with unconjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and chlorin e6-conjugated secondary antibodies. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with unconjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and chlorin e6-conjugated secondary antibodies in the presence of 0.5 mM sodium azide. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with unconjugated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and chlorin e6-conjugated secondary antibodies in the presence of 2 mM sodium azide. Lane 4, unphotolyzed mOGG1 (Molecular mass/Gel migration standard).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Photolysis of mOGG1 by biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies-rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin complexes
MOGG1 was incubated with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions and either unconjugated streptavidin or rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin in the presence of visible light as described in Materials and Methods. All irradiations were conducted at 25°C for 30 min. Each lane of a 7.5–15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel was loaded with 10 μl of reaction mixture. Gels were stained overnight with Coomassie blue. (A) Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 2 μg of unconjugated streptavidin. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 0.5 μg of rose bengal conjugated-streptavidin. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 1 μg of rose bengal conjugated-streptavidin. Lane 4, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 2.0 μg of rose bengal conjugated-streptavidin. Lanes 1–4, biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:50. (B) Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with 1 μl biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:2 and rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin. Lane 3, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:5 and rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin. Lane 4, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies diluted 1:10 and rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin. (B) Lanes 1–4 contain 1 μg of rose bengal-conjugated streptavidin. Lane 5, unphotolyzed mOGG1 (Molecular mass/Gel migration standard).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Photoproteolysis of mOGG1 by biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies-chlorin e6-conjugated streptavidin complexes
MOGG1 was incubated with 1 μl biotinylated anti-mOGG1 rabbit IgG fractions and either unconjugated streptavidin or chlorin e6-conjugated streptavidin in the presence or absence of visible light as described in Materials and Methods. All irradiations were conducted at 25°C for 30 min. Each lane of a 7.5–15% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel was loaded with 10 μl of reaction mixture. Gels were stained overnight with Coomassie blue. Lane 1, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 1 μg unconjugated streptavidin. Lane 2, mOGG1 photolyzed with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 1 μg chlorin e6-conjugated streptavidin. Lane 3, mOGG1 incubated in the dark with biotinylated anti-mOGG1 antibodies and 1 μg chlorin e6-conjugated streptavidin. Lane 4, unphotolyzed mOGG1 (Molecular mass/Gel migration standard).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berg K, Selbo PK, Weyergang A, Dietze A, Prasmickaite L, Bonsted A, Engesaeter BO, Angell-Petersen E, Warloe T, Frandsen N, Hogset A. Porphyrin-related photosensitizers for cancer imaging and therapeutic applications. J Microsc. 2005;218:133–147. - PubMed
    1. Henderson BW, Dougherty TJ. How does photodynamic therapy work? Photochem Photobiol. 1992;55:145–157. - PubMed
    1. Harris F, Sayed Z, Hussain S, Phoenix D. An investigation into the potential of phenothiazinium-based photo-sensitisers to act as PDT agents. Photodiagn and Photodyn Ther. 2004;1:231–239. - PubMed
    1. Bhatti M, MacRobert A, Meghji S, Henderson B, Wilson M. A study of the uptake of toluidine blue O by Porphyromonas gingivalis and the mechanism of lethal photosensitization. Photochem Photobiol. 1998;68:370–376. - PubMed
    1. Hass BS, Webb RB. Photodynamic effects of dyes on bacteria. IV. Lethal effects of acridine orange and 460- or 500-nm monochromatic light in strains of Escherichia coli that differ in repair capability. Mutat Res. 1981;81:277–285. - PubMed

Publication types