Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia
- PMID: 17251531
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094
Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia
Abstract
Background: Patients with neutropenia resulting from chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome are at high risk for difficult-to-treat and often fatal invasive fungal infections.
Methods: In this randomized, multicenter study involving evaluators who were unaware of treatment assignments, we compared the efficacy and safety of posaconazole with those of fluconazole or itraconazole as prophylaxis for patients with prolonged neutropenia. Patients received prophylaxis with each cycle of chemotherapy until recovery from neutropenia and complete remission, until occurrence of an invasive fungal infection, or for up to 12 weeks, whichever came first. We compared the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections during treatment (the primary end point) between the posaconazole and fluconazole or itraconazole groups; death from any cause and time to death were secondary end points.
Results: A total of 304 patients were randomly assigned to receive posaconazole, and 298 patients were randomly assigned to receive fluconazole (240) or itraconazole (58). Proven or probable invasive fungal infections were reported in 7 patients (2%) in the posaconazole group and 25 patients (8%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (absolute reduction in the posaconazole group, -6%; 95% confidence interval, -9.7 to -2.5%; P<0.001), fulfilling statistical criteria for superiority. Significantly fewer patients in the posaconazole group had invasive aspergillosis (2 [1%] vs. 20 [7%], P<0.001). Survival was significantly longer among recipients of posaconazole than among recipients of fluconazole or itraconazole (P=0.04). Serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment were reported by 19 patients (6%) in the posaconazole group and 6 patients (2%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (P=0.01). The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were gastrointestinal tract disturbances.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome, posaconazole prevented invasive fungal infections more effectively than did either fluconazole or itraconazole and improved overall survival. There were more serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment in the posaconazole group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00044486 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Prophylaxis and aspergillosis--has the principle been proven?N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):409-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068266. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17251538 No abstract available.
-
Posaconazole prophylaxis in hematologic cancer.N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2214; author reply 2215-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc070471. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17522407 No abstract available.
-
Posaconazole prophylaxis in hematologic cancer.N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2215; author reply 2215-8. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17526089 No abstract available.
-
Posaconazole prophylaxis in hematologic cancer.N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2214-5; author reply 2215-8. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17526090 No abstract available.
-
Does posaconazole prevent invasive fungal infections in patients with neutropenia?Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007 Sep;4(9):512-3. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0907. Epub 2007 Jul 24. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17646862 No abstract available.
-
Azole prophylaxis to prevent invasive fungal infections in patients with profound neutropenia.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007 Nov;9(6):446-7. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007. PMID: 17999879 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical