[Side effects and risk factors of various plasma donation methods]
- PMID: 1725664
[Side effects and risk factors of various plasma donation methods]
Abstract
Weekly plasma donations of 600 ml were carried out for ten weeks on 20 probands to compare the Plasma Collecting System, Autopheresis C, Plamapur Monitor and the conventional double bag centrifugation. In terms of compatibility for the donor the different systems appear comparable. The PCS tubing set has to be emptied by isotonic saline at the end of the procedure. In the Autopheresis C and Plasmapur Monitor special care should be taken not to mix up isotonic saline and anticoagulant solutions. The protein concentration is higher in the centrifugation systems, but platelet contamination is higher, too.
Similar articles
-
[Comparison of 4 plasmapheresis procedures].Beitr Infusionsther. 1991;28:65-76. Beitr Infusionsther. 1991. PMID: 1725662 German.
-
[Efficiency of mechanical plasmapheresis].Beitr Infusionsther. 1991;28:56-64. Beitr Infusionsther. 1991. PMID: 1725661 German.
-
[Comparative analysis of various plasmapheresis methods--modern procedures of mechanical plasma collection compared with each other and with manual bag centrifugation procedures].Beitr Infusionsther. 1993;29:163-89. Beitr Infusionsther. 1993. PMID: 7690649 German.
-
Infectious risk of plasma donations: relationship to safety of intravenous immune globulins.Clin Exp Immunol. 1996 May;104 Suppl 1:31-4. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996. PMID: 8625541 Review.
-
Non-remunerated donations.Dev Biol Stand. 1993;81:51-6. Dev Biol Stand. 1993. PMID: 8174820 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical