Isolation and structural characterization of a family of endohedral fullerenes including the large, chiral cage fullerenes Tb(3)N@C(88) and Tb(3)N@C(86) as well as the I(h) and D(5)(h) isomers of Tb(3)N@C(80)

Abstract

The recent finding that isomer 2 of Tb(3)N@C(84) uses one of the 51,568 possible nonisolated pentagon rule (non-IPR) structures for the C(84) cage rather than one of the 24 cage isomers that do obey the IPR suggests that further experimental work on the structure of larger endohedrals is needed to observe the utility of the IPR rule in this uncharted territory. The structures of the newly synthesized endohedral fullerenes--Tb(3)N@C(88), Tb(3)N@C(86), and the Ih and D(5)(h) isomers of Tb(3)N@C(80)--have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction on samples cocrystallized with NiII(octaethylporphyrin). In contrast to the situation for isomer 2 of Tb(3)N@C(84), the structures of Tb(3)N@C(88) and Tb(3)N@C(86) do conform to the IPR. Both Tb(3)N@C(88) and Tb(3)N@C(86) have chiral structures with D(2) symmetry for Tb(3)N@C(880 and D(3) symmetry for Tb(3)N@C(86). Within this group of endohedrals, the size of the carbon cage affects the Tb-N and Tb-C distances, the orientations of the carbon cage with respect to the porphyrin plane, the locations of the metal ions and their orientations relative to the porphyrin plane, and the degree of pyramidalization of the Tb(3)N unit.