Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):293-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2.

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison

Julio A Chalela et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Although the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of acute stroke is increasing, this method has not proved more effective than computed tomography (CT) in the emergency setting. We aimed to prospectively compare CT and MRI for emergency diagnosis of acute stroke.

Methods: We did a single-centre, prospective, blind comparison of non-contrast CT and MRI (with diffusion-weighted and susceptibility weighted images) in a consecutive series of patients referred for emergency assessment of suspected acute stroke. Scans were independently interpreted by four experts, who were unaware of clinical information, MRI-CT pairings, and follow-up imaging.

Results: 356 patients, 217 of whom had a final clinical diagnosis of acute stroke, were assessed. MRI detected acute stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), acute ischaemic stroke, and chronic haemorrhage more frequently than did CT (p<0.0001, for all comparisons). MRI was similar to CT for the detection of acute intracranial haemorrhage. MRI detected acute ischaemic stroke in 164 of 356 patients (46%; 95% CI 41-51%), compared with CT in 35 of 356 patients (10%; 7-14%). In the subset of patients scanned within 3 h of symptom onset, MRI detected acute ischaemic stroke in 41 of 90 patients (46%; 35-56%); CT in 6 of 90 (7%; 3-14%). Relative to the final clinical diagnosis, MRI had a sensitivity of 83% (181 of 217; 78-88%) and CT of 26% (56 of 217; 20-32%) for the diagnosis of any acute stroke.

Interpretation: MRI is better than CT for detection of acute ischaemia, and can detect acute and chronic haemorrhage; therefore it should be the preferred test for accurate diagnosis of patients with suspected acute stroke. Because our patient sample encompassed the range of disease that is likely to be encountered in emergency cases of suspected stroke, our results are directly applicable to clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • MRI and stroke: why has it taken so long?
    Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Davis SM. Donnan GA, et al. Lancet. 2007 Jan 27;369(9558):252-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60122-6. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17258648 No abstract available.
  • MRI versus CT in acute stroke.
    von Kummer R, Dzialowski I. von Kummer R, et al. Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1341-1342. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60621-7. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17448808 No abstract available.
  • MRI versus CT in acute stroke.
    Meissner W, Sibon I, Rouanet F, Ménégon P, Orgogozo JM. Meissner W, et al. Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1342. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60623-0. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17448810 No abstract available.
  • MRI versus CT in acute stroke.
    Ciccone A, Sterzi R, Munari L; students assessing the paper. Ciccone A, et al. Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1342-1343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60624-2. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17448811 No abstract available.
  • Should all patients with suspected stroke have brain MRI instead of CT?
    Wardlaw JM. Wardlaw JM. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Jul;4(7):362-3. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0908. Epub 2007 May 15. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007. PMID: 17502880 No abstract available.
  • Should MRI replace CT for the routine evaluation of acute stroke?
    von Kummer R, Dzialowski I. von Kummer R, et al. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007 Aug;3(8):428-9. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0532. Epub 2007 Jul 24. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007. PMID: 17646861 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fiebach JB, Schellinger PD, Gass A, et al. Stroke magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter study on the validity of stroke imaging. Stroke. 2004;35:502–06. - PubMed
    1. Grotta JC, Chiu D, Lu M, et al. Agreement and variability in the interpretation of early CT changes in stroke patients qualifying for intravenous rtPA therapy. Stroke. 1999;30:1528–33. - PubMed
    1. Kidwell CS, Chalela JA, Saver JL, et al. Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA. 2004;292:1823–30. - PubMed
    1. Wardlaw JM, Mielke O. Early signs of brain infarction at CT: observer reliability and outcome after thrombolytic treatment—systematic review. Radiology. 2005;235:444–53. - PubMed
    1. Warach S, Gaa J, Siewert B, Wielopolski P, Edelman RR. Acute human stroke studied by whole brain echo planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 1995;37:231–41. - PubMed

Publication types