Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Feb 17;334(7589):352.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39093.464190.55. Epub 2007 Jan 26.

Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients' reassurance: randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients' reassurance: randomised controlled trial

Keith J Petrie et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether providing information about normal findings before a diagnostic test improves patients' reassurance and reduces anxiety about symptoms.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Outpatient cardiology clinic.

Participants: 92 patients with chest pain referred for a diagnostic exercise stress test.

Intervention: Before undergoing testing patients were randomised to receive standard information (n=28; control group), a pamphlet explaining the function of the test and the meaning of normal test results (n=30; pamphlet group), or the pamphlet and a brief discussion about the meaning of normal test results (n=34; discussion group).

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was patients' reported reassurance on a 5 item scale immediately after the test and at one month. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients still with chest pain and still taking cardiac drugs at one month.

Results: The mean levels of reassurance after testing and feedback from the doctor were significantly higher in the discussion group (42.0, 95% confidence interval 39.7 to 44.2) than in the pamphlet (39.2, 36.1 to 42.3) and control groups (35.8, 31.6 to 39.9). This difference was maintained at one month. The proportion of patients still reporting chest pain at one month decreased significantly in the discussion group (to 17%) and pamphlet group (to 28%) but not in the control group (to 36%). A trend was for fewer patients in the discussion group to be taking cardiac drugs at one month.

Conclusion: Providing patients with information about normal test results before testing can improve rates of reassurance and reduce the likelihood of future reports of chest pain.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN87589121 [controlled-trials.com].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Participant flow through study
None
Fig 2 Dot plot for item asking patients how reassured they were by the exercise stress test after testing and at one month follow-up in experimental groups, including means (95% confidence intervals)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howard L, Wessely S. Reappraising reassurance: the role of investigations. J Psychosom Res 1996;41:307-11. - PubMed
    1. McDonald IG, Daly J, Jelinek VM, Panetta F, Gutman JM. Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result. BMJ 1996;313:329-32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Potts SG, Bass CM. Psychological morbidity in patients with chest pain and normal or near normal coronary arteries: a long-term follow-up study. Psychol Med 1995;25:339-47. - PubMed
    1. Fitzpatrick R, Hopkins A. Referrals to neurologists for headaches not due to structural disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981;44:1061-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donkin L, Ellis CJ, Powell R, Broadbent E, Gamble G, Petrie KJ. Illness perceptions predict reassurance following negative exercise testing result. Psychol Health 2006;21:421-30.

Publication types

Associated data