Review of clinical experience in the United States with cefpodoxime proxetil in adults with uncomplicated urinary tract infections
- PMID: 1726207
- DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199100423-00009
Review of clinical experience in the United States with cefpodoxime proxetil in adults with uncomplicated urinary tract infections
Abstract
Two controlled United States trials compared the safety and efficacy of cefpodoxime proxetil (100mg twice daily) with either cefaclor (250mg 3 times daily) or amoxicillin (250mg 3 times daily) in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Treatment duration was 7 days. 307 of 762 patients treated with cefpodoxime proxetil, 99 of 190 treated with cefaclor, and 57 of 185 treated with amoxicillin were evaluable for efficacy. 311, 99 and 59 pathogens were isolated from cefpodoxime proxetil, cefaclor and amoxicillin patients, respectively, the most common pathogens being Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Bacteriological cure rates were 80% (247/307), 82% (81/99) and 70% (40/57) for cefpodoxime proxetil, cefaclor and amoxicillin, respectively. Respective clinical cure rates were 79% (242/307), 79% (78/99) and 72% (41/57). Cefpodoxime proxetil was well tolerated, and there was no significant difference between the groups in the overall incidence of adverse experiences. Thus, cefpodoxime proxetil is efficacious and safe in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections and compares favourably with cefaclor and amoxicillin.
Similar articles
-
Cefpodoxime proxetil: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections in paediatric patients.Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(2):137-58. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103020-00006. Paediatr Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11269640 Review.
-
Cefpodoxime proxetil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.Drugs. 1991;42 Suppl 3:34-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199100423-00008. Drugs. 1991. PMID: 1726206 Review.
-
Clinical experience with cefpodoxime proxetil in acute otitis media.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Apr;14(4 Suppl):S12-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199504001-00003. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995. PMID: 7792125 Review.
-
Comparison of oral cefpodoxime proxetil and cefaclor in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Feb;16(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90006-s. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993. PMID: 8467623 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil with cefaclor in the treatment of sinusitis.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26 Suppl E:87-91. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.87. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990. PMID: 2127269 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Cefpodoxime-proxetil versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for short-term therapy of uncomplicated acute cystitis in women.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Mar;47(3):897-900. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.897-900.2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003. PMID: 12604518 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cefpodoxime proxetil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.Drugs. 1992 Nov;44(5):889-917. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244050-00011. Drugs. 1992. PMID: 1280571 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous