Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks
- PMID: 17263072
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03195912
Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks
Abstract
When two masked, to-be-attended targets are presented within approximately half a second of each other, performance on the second target (T2) suffers, relative to when the targets are presented further apart in time or when the first target (T1) can be ignored. This pattern of results is known as the attentional blink (AB). Typically, participants differ with respect to the magnitude of their AB and their overall target accuracy. Despite investigations as to what participant characteristics may influence AB performance (e.g., age, brain damage, or mood state), there has been no focused examination of whether individual differences in cognitive performance measures predict the magnitude of the AB or overall rapid serial visual presentation(RSVP) target accuracy. Our university studentparticipants performed single-target and dual-target RSVP tasks, as well as a selection of cognitive tasks that did not use RSVP presentations, with color, letter, digit, and object stimuli. Overall performance on each of the RSVP targets (T1, T2, and single target) was predicted by speeded manual and vocal identification times to isolated stimuli and by performance with other RSVP targets. However, the magnitude of the AB was predicted only by T1 accuracy, not by any other performance measures. The results suggest that individual differences in AB magnitude do not result from differences in effective RSVP target encoding and are not well explained by varied information-processing abilities.
Similar articles
-
Individual differences in dual-target RSVP task performance relate to entrainment but not to individual alpha frequency.PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0178934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178934. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28604795 Free PMC article.
-
Attentional blink for color.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Dec;25(6):1483-94. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1483. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999. PMID: 10681214
-
Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink.PLoS One. 2008 Oct 3;3(10):e3330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003330. PLoS One. 2008. PMID: 18833325 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.Percept Psychophys. 2004 Nov;66(8):1418-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03195008. Percept Psychophys. 2004. PMID: 15813204
-
Greater attentional blink magnitude is associated with higher levels of anticipatory attention as measured by alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD).Brain Res. 2011 Apr 28;1387:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.069. Epub 2011 Mar 17. Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21362413
Cited by
-
How reliable is the attentional blink? Examining the relationships within and between attentional blink tasks over time.Psychol Res. 2013 Mar;77(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0403-y. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Psychol Res. 2013. PMID: 22159732
-
How does information processing speed relate to the attentional blink?PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033265. Epub 2012 Mar 26. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22461892 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Attentional blink and impulsiveness: evidence for higher functional impulsivity in non-blinkers compared to blinkers.Cogn Process. 2013 Aug;14(3):273-81. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0553-5. Epub 2013 Feb 28. Cogn Process. 2013. PMID: 23455945
-
Alpha, beta: The rhythm of the attentional blink.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1862-1869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1257-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28271390
-
Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect.J Intell. 2018 Oct 15;6(4):47. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040047. J Intell. 2018. PMID: 31162474 Free PMC article.