Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan 31:5:5.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-5-5.

Expression of costimulatory molecules in the bovine corpus luteum

Affiliations

Expression of costimulatory molecules in the bovine corpus luteum

Matthew J Cannon et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Background: Bovine luteal parenchymal cells express class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and stimulate class II MHC-dependent activation of T cells in vitro. The ability of a class II MHC-expressing cell type to elicit a response from T cells in vivo is also dependent on expression of costimulatory molecules by the antigen presenting cell and delivery of a costimulatory signal to the T cell. Whether bovine luteal parenchymal cells express costimulatory molecules and can deliver the costimulatory signal is currently unknown.

Methods: Bovine luteal tissue was collected during the early (day 5; day of estrus = day 0), mid (day 11-12), or late (day 18) luteal phase of the estrous cycle, and at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 or 24 hours following administration of PGF2alpha to cows on day 10 of the estrous cycle. Northern analysis was used to measure CD80 or CD86 mRNA concentrations in luteal tissue samples. Mixed luteal parenchymal cell cultures and purified luteal endothelial cell cultures were prepared, and real-time RT-PCR was used to examine the presence of CD80 and CD86 mRNA in each culture type. Monoclonal antibodies to CD80 and CD86 were added to a mixed luteal parenchymal cell-T cell co-culture in vitro T cell proliferation assay to assess the functional significance of costimulatory molecules on activation of T lymphocytes by luteal parenchymal cells.

Results: Northern analysis revealed CD80 and CD86 mRNAs in luteal tissue, with greatest steady-state concentrations at midcycle. CD80 and CD86 mRNAs were detected in mixed luteal parenchymal cell cultures, but only slight amounts of CD80 (and not CD86) mRNA were detected in cultures of luteal endothelial cells. Luteinizing hormone, PGF2alpha and TNF-alpha were without effect on concentrations of CD80 or CD86 mRNA in mixed luteal parenchymal cells cultures. Anti-CD80 or anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies inhibited T cell proliferation in the in vitro T cell proliferation assay.

Conclusion: It can be concluded from this study that parenchymal cells within the bovine CL express functional costimulatory molecules that facilitate interactions between with T cells, and these components of the antigen presentation pathway are expressed maximally in the midcycle CL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Northern analysis of CD80 and bovine luteal tissue. A) Representative Northern blot of CD80 mRNA and corresponding G3PDH mRNA in luteal tissue samples collected early, during midcycle, or late in the estrous cycle, and at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 or 24 hours following administration of PGF. Muscle tissue RNA served as a negative control, and lymph node RNA served as a positive control. B) Steady-state concentrations of CD80 mRNA in luteal tissue. Bars represent densitometric values of CD80 mRNA normalized to G3PDH mRNA detected by Northern analysis (n = 4 CL at each time point). Values with different letters tended to be different (p = 0.074).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) Representative Northern blot of CD86 mRNA and corresponding G3PDH mRNA in luteal tissue samples collected early, during midcycle, or late in the estrous cycle, and at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 12 or 24 hours following administration of PGF. Muscle tissue RNA served as a negative control, and lymph node RNA served as a positive control. B) Steady-state concentrations of CD86 mRNA in luteal tissue. Bars represent densitometric values of CD86 mRNA normalized to G3PDH mRNA detected by Northern analysis (n = 4 CL at each time point). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Agarose gel displaying PCR products from quantitative RT-PCR analysis of CD80 and CD86 mRNA in samples extracted from cultures of (A) mixed luteal cells or (B) luteal endothelial (CLENDO) cells (n = 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4
PCR analysis of regulation of CD80 and CD86 expression in cultured luteal cells. Bars represent steady-state concentrations of CD80 and CD86 mRNA in cultured bovine luteal cells treated with LH (10 ng/ml), PGF(10 ng/ml), and/or TNF-α (50 ng/ml). A) Bars represent densitometric values of amplified CD80 mRNA products, standardized to G3PDH, as detected by semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis. There were no significant differences (p > 0.10; n = 4). B) Bars represent CD86 cDNA concentrations, as determined by RT-qPCR analysis. There were no significant differences (p > 0.10; n = 4).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effects of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 antibodies on luteal cell-stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation. Bars represent T lymphocyte proliferation (as measured by H3-thymidine incorporation) in co-cultures of luteal cells and T lymphocytes (black bars) or PBMCs and T lymphocytes (gray bars), in the absence or presence of anti-CD80 or anti-CD86 mAbs. Difference superscripts represent significant differences (n = 4; p < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hume DA, Halpin D, Charlton H, Gorospe WC. The mononulcear phagocyte system of the mouse defined by immunohistochemical localization of antigen F4/80: macrophages of endocrine organs. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:4174–4177. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.4174. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagavandoss P, Wiggins RC, Kunkel SC, Remick DG, Keyes PL. Tumor necrosis factor production and accumulation of inflammatory cells in the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy and pregnancy in rabbits. Biol Reprod. 1990;42:367–376. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod42.2.367. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bränström M, Giesecke L, Moore IC, van den Heuvel CJ, Robertson SA. Leukocyte subpopulations in the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy and pseudopregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1994;50:1161–1167. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod50.5.1161. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawler DF, Hopkins J, Watson DE. Immune cell populations in the equine corpus luteum throughout the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy: an immunohistochemical and flow cytometric study. J Reprod Fert. 1999;117:281–290. - PubMed
    1. Penny LA, Armstrong D, Bramley TA, Webb R, Collins RA, Watson ED. Immune cells and cytokine production in the bovine corpus luteum throughout the oestrous cycle and after induced luteolysis. J Reprod Fert. 1999;115:87–96. - PubMed

Publication types