Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;83(975):62-3.
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.050112.

Importance of red patches diagnosed in cystoscopy for haematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms

Herman Fernando  1 , Sreenivasa S Thota, Glyn Burtt, Nicholas Waterfall, Imtiaz Husain
Affiliations

Importance of red patches diagnosed in cystoscopy for haematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms

Herman Fernando et al. Postgrad Med J. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Biopsy of the red patches in the bladder, when found at cystoscopy, is routinely performed in urological practice. This is done to establish the sinister diagnosis of carcinoma-in-situ among other causes.

Objective: To analyse the pathology of the red patches and to determine if routine biopsy of these patches is warranted.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study conducted over a period of 36 months, in which 50 patients were identified, who underwent biopsies of their red patches. All patients with a history of bladder carcinoma and obvious bladder tumours were excluded from this study.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 60.8 years. 25 patients had cystoscopy for lower urinary tract symptoms, 21 for haematuria and 4 for recurrent urinary tract infection. Carcinoma in situ was found in 4 (8%) patients, of whom only 2 had positive urine cytology.

Conclusion: It is prudent to perform a biopsy of all incidentally diagnosed red patches because of a major yield rate of carcinoma in situ. This procedure also picks up other important pathologies, which help in further management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Messing E M. Urothelial tumours of the urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Darracott Vaughan Jr E, et al. eds. Campbell's urology. 8th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998
    1. Utz D C, Farrow G M. Carcinoma in situ of the urinary tract. Urol Clin North Am 198411735 - PubMed
    1. Utz D C, Hanash K A, Farrow G M. The plight of the patient with carcinoma in situ of the bladder. J Urol 1970103160 - PubMed
    1. Swinn M J, Walker M M, Harbib L J.et al Biopsy of the red‐patch at cystoscopy: is it worthwhile? Eur Urol 200445471–474. - PubMed
    1. Cina S J, Epstein J I, Endrizzi J M.et al Correlation of cystoscopic impression with histological diagnosis of biopsy specimens of the bladder. Hum Pathol 200132630–637. - PubMed