Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones
- PMID: 17268897
- DOI: 10.1007/s11255-006-0104-4
Prediction of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric stones
Abstract
Objectives: To define the factors that affect the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of ureteric stones.
Patients and methods: Between January 2000 and December 2003, 468 patients with ureteric stones underwent in situ ESWL using Storz SL 20 lithotriptor. The results of treatment were evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. Treatment success was defined as complete clearance of the stones. Characteristics of the patients, condition of the urinary tract and stone features were correlated to the success rate to define the significant predictors of success.
Results: At 3-month follow-up, the overall success rate was 394/468 (84.2%). Repeat treatment was required in 239 patients (51.1%). Post-ESWL auxiliary procedures were necessary in 58 patients (12.4%). Post-ESWL complications were observed in 11 patients (2.4%). Only three factors had a significant impact on the stone-free rate, namely stone site, stone width and the presence of a ureteral stent. The stone-free rate was highest for stones located in the lumbar ureter (159/183; 86.9%) and lowest for those in iliac ureter (28/40; 70%) (P < 0.05). Stones with a transverse diameter <8 mm were associated with a stone-free rate of 89.9% (248/276), compared to 66.7% (128/192) for those with a transverse diameter of >8 mm (P < 0.01). Non-stented patients had a stone-free rate of 89.2% (313/348), compared to 75.2% (85/113) for stented patients (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: The site and transverse diameter of the stone and the presence of a ureteral stent are the only significant predictors of success of ESWL therapy for ureteric stones.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(5):413-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590310006255. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003. PMID: 14594691
-
Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones.Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(1):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-005-3155-z. Int Urol Nephrol. 2006. PMID: 16502054
-
Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(2):161-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310022626. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004. PMID: 15204407
-
[Clinical experience of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with lithodiagnost M for upper urinary tract stones].Hinyokika Kiyo. 1998 Jan;44(1):1-5. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1998. PMID: 9503199 Review. Japanese.
-
[Treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves].Arch Esp Urol. 2001 Nov;54(9):971-82. Arch Esp Urol. 2001. PMID: 11789374 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.Urol Res. 2011 Feb;39(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0274-5. Epub 2010 Apr 18. Urol Res. 2011. PMID: 20401653
-
Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones.Urol Ann. 2018 Apr-Jun;10(2):159-164. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_84_17. Urol Ann. 2018. PMID: 29719327 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Patients With Infected Ureterohydronephrosis Due to Ureteral Stones Following Double-J Catheter Insertion.Cureus. 2024 Jan 6;16(1):e51742. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51742. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38318541 Free PMC article.
-
Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0062-3. Epub 2011 Sep 30. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 21960371 Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources