#4: no routine interventions
- PMID: 17273385
- PMCID: PMC1595194
- DOI: 10.1624/105812404X109500
#4: no routine interventions
Abstract
In this position paper-one of six care practice papers published by Lamaze International and reprinted here with permission-the benefit of no routine interventions during birth is discussed and presented as an evidence-based practice that helps promote, protect, and support normal birth. The paper is written for childbearing women and their families. It presents evidence related to restrictions on eating and drinking, use of intravenous fluids, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, artificial rupture of the membranes, augmentation of labor, and epidural analgesia. The accompanying commentary-written by an award-winning medical writer-supports and expands on the benefits of no routine interventions during birth. Lamaze International recommends that laboring women avoid restrictions on eating and drinking. The organization also recommends avoidance of IVs, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, epidurals, and efforts to speed up labor, unless a clear indication for their use is evident.
References
-
- Boschert S. Anesthesiologists defend epidural safety. 1998, July 15. Ob. Gyn. News, p. 20.
-
- Davis-Floyd R. E. 1992. Birth as an American rite of passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
-
- Declerq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S, Risher P. 2002. Listening to mothers: Report of the first national U.S. survey of women's childbearing experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association. - PubMed
-
- Janeway E. 1971. Man's world, woman's place. New York: William Morrow.
-
- Marmor T. R, Krol D. M. Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186:S173–S180. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources