Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art
- PMID: 1727344
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.1.1727344
Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art
Abstract
Computed radiography is a 2K x 2K x 10 bit digital radiographic system that replaces the film-screen combination with a photo-stimulable phosphor plate. The advantages of this relatively new technology include linear detector response, improved detector efficiency, and digital processing capabilities. Musculoskeletal applications benefit significantly from these attributes, which result clinically in the ability to reduce both radiation dose and number of exposures. Studies of observers' performance have shown no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between film-screen and computed radiographic musculoskeletal images. Computed radiography is particularly useful in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system in traumatized patients with portable radiographs, spine radiographs, scoliosis studies, and depiction of soft-tissue abnormalities. Limitations include change in image format and size, high cost, decreased spatial resolution, restricted throughput, increased perception of noise, and new artifacts that must be recognized. Spatial resolution limitations of computed radiography in identification of fine detail information can be improved by using magnification techniques. Radiation dose reduction with an exposure decrease of 25-50% can be achieved without loss of diagnostic accuracy, although this depends on the examination and the abnormality. An interactive workstation is important in the use of a computed radiographic system with capabilities to adjust display parameters to best depict images and disease. We conclude that computed radiography is an alternative to film-screen radiography without significant differences in diagnostic quality in the evaluation of musculoskeletal images.
Similar articles
-
Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.Swed Dent J Suppl. 1999;139:i-viii, 1-67. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1999. PMID: 10635104
-
Pediatric musculoskeletal computed radiography.Pediatr Radiol. 1997 Jul;27(7):563-75. doi: 10.1007/s002470050184. Pediatr Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9211947 Review.
-
Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Oct;181(4):923-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810923. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. PMID: 14500203
-
Digital radiography of the spine, large bones and joints using stimulable phosphor. Early clinical experience.Acta Radiol. 1988 May-Jun;29(3):267-71. Acta Radiol. 1988. PMID: 2968093
-
[Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].Radiol Med. 1994 Jun;87(6):847-51. Radiol Med. 1994. PMID: 8041940 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine.Emerg Radiol. 2003 Apr;10(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s10140-003-0271-x. Epub 2003 Apr 9. Emerg Radiol. 2003. PMID: 15290526
-
Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging.Postgrad Med J. 2006 Jul;82(969):425-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448. Postgrad Med J. 2006. PMID: 16822918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emerging Diagnostic Approaches for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Advances in Imaging, Biomarkers, and Clinical Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;15(13):1648. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131648. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40647646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of stimulable phosphor technology and conventional screen-film technology in pediatric scoliosis.Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02017647. Pediatr Radiol. 1994. PMID: 8008484 Clinical Trial.
-
EOS imaging versus current radiography: A health technology assessment study.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Feb 17;30:331. eCollection 2016. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016. PMID: 27390701 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources