Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in Mammalian and nonmammalian vision
- PMID: 17275301
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.025
Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in Mammalian and nonmammalian vision
Abstract
An infinite number of 2D patterns on the retina can correspond to a single 3D object. How do visual systems resolve this ill-posed problem and recognize objects from only a few 2D retinal projections in varied exposure conditions? Theories of object recognition rely on the nonaccidental statistics of edge properties, mainly symmetry, collinearity, curvilinearity, and cotermination. These statistics are determined by the image-formation process (i.e., the 2D retinal projection of a 3D object ); their existence under a range of viewpoints enables viewpoint-invariant recognition. An important question in behavioral biology is whether the visual systems of nonmammalian animals have also evolved biases to utilize nonaccidental statistics . Here, we trained humans and pigeons to recognize four shapes. With the Bubbles technique, we determined which stimulus properties both species used to recognize the shapes. Both humans and pigeons used cotermination, the most diagnostic nonaccidental property of real-world objects, despite evidence from a model computer observer that cotermination was not the most diagnostic pictorial information in this particular task. This result reveals that a nonmammalian visual system that is different anatomically from the human visual system is also biased to recognize objects from nonaccidental statistics.
Comment in
-
Object recognition: similar visual strategies of birds and mammals.Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 6;17(5):R174-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.014. Curr Biol. 2007. PMID: 17339018
Similar articles
-
Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features.Neural Netw. 2004 Jun-Jul;17(5-6):833-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.01.006. Neural Netw. 2004. PMID: 15288901
-
Object recognition: similar visual strategies of birds and mammals.Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 6;17(5):R174-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.014. Curr Biol. 2007. PMID: 17339018
-
How position dependent is visual object recognition?Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;12(3):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 11. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008. PMID: 18262829 Review.
-
Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy.Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.009. Epub 2006 Dec 22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007. PMID: 17188555 Review.
-
Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape.Behav Processes. 2005 Apr 29;69(1):17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.007. Behav Processes. 2005. PMID: 15795067
Cited by
-
Towards describing scenes by animals: Pigeons' ordinal discrimination of objects varying in depth.Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):85-98. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00444-3. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Learn Behav. 2021. PMID: 32968857
-
Recognition of natural objects in the archerfish.J Exp Biol. 2022 Feb 1;225(3):jeb243237. doi: 10.1242/jeb.243237. Epub 2022 Feb 10. J Exp Biol. 2022. PMID: 35142811 Free PMC article.
-
Object similarity affects the perceptual strategy underlying invariant visual object recognition in rats.Front Neural Circuits. 2015 Mar 12;9:10. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2015.00010. eCollection 2015. Front Neural Circuits. 2015. PMID: 25814936 Free PMC article.
-
Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Mar;12(1):220-40. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0070-x. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22086545
-
The role of line junctions in object recognition: The case of reading musical notation.Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1373-1380. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1483-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 29713944
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources