Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Jan 1;69(1):175-80.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920101)69:1<175::aid-cncr2820690129>3.0.co;2-b.

High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20-year experience

Affiliations

High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20-year experience

T Arai et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Retrospective analysis was performed on 1022 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix who were treated with high-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary irradiation at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Angawa, Chiba-shi, Japan, from 1968 to 1982 in comparison with low-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy. The patient population consisted of 147 patients with Stage I disease, 256 patients with Stage II disease, 515 patients with Stage III disease, and 104 patients with Stage IV disease. Absolute 5-year survival rates for Stages Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIb, IVa, and IVb disease were 88.1%, 76.9%, 67.0%, 52.2%, 24.1%, and 13.3%, respectively. The rates of severe complication of Grades 3 and 4 were 4.1% for the rectosigmoid colon, 1.2% for the bladder, and 1.1% for the small intestine. In the case of Stage I to II disease, the optimal dose from intracavitary sources was suggested to be 2900 cGy +/- 200 cGy at point A, with 4 to 5 fractions of 600 to 700 cGy delivered over 4 to 5 weeks. These results suggested that high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy provided clinical results comparable to those of a low-dose-rate technique.

PubMed Disclaimer