Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Apr;175(4):1895-910.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.063743. Epub 2007 Feb 4.

Prediction of breeding values and selection responses with genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prediction of breeding values and selection responses with genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance

H A Mulder et al. Genetics. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

There is empirical evidence that genotypes differ not only in mean, but also in environmental variance of the traits they affect. Genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance may indicate genetic differences in environmental sensitivity. The aim of this study was to develop a general framework for prediction of breeding values and selection responses in mean and environmental variance with genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance. Both means and environmental variances were treated as heritable traits. Breeding values and selection responses were predicted with little bias using linear, quadratic, and cubic regression on individual phenotype or using linear regression on the mean and within-family variance of a group of relatives. A measure of heritability was proposed for environmental variance to standardize results in the literature and to facilitate comparisons to "conventional" traits. Genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance can be considered as a trait with a low heritability. Although a large amount of information is necessary to accurately estimate breeding values for environmental variance, response in environmental variance can be substantial, even with mass selection. The methods developed allow use of the well-known selection index framework to evaluate breeding strategies and effects of natural selection that simultaneously change the mean and the variance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>igure</sc> 1.—
Figure 1.—
Expected formula image (A) and formula image (B) as a function of P and P2, respectively (formula image; formula image; formula image; formula image; formula image).
F<sc>igure</sc> 2.—
Figure 2.—
Expected (MC) and predicted breeding values formula image (A) and formula image (B) based on a single phenotype as a function of phenotype using the full model with multiple regression on P, P2, and P3 (MR3) or the reduced model with multiple regression on P and P2 (MR2) (formula image; formula image; formula image; formula image; formula image).
F<sc>igure</sc> 3.—
Figure 3.—
Expected (MC) and predicted formula image as a function of the standardized mean phenotype of half-sib progeny (A) and expected and predicted formula image as a function of formula image (B) using either formula image (MR linear) or formula image (MR log) in multiple regression (formula image; formula image; formula image; formula image; formula image; number of half-sib progeny/sire = 100).

References

    1. Bulmer, M. G., 1971. The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am. Nat. 105: 201–211.
    1. Cameron, N. D., 1997. Selection Indices and Prediction of Genetic Merit in Animal Breeding. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
    1. Cardin, S., and F. Minvielle, 1986. Selection on phenotypic variation of pupa weight in Tribolium castaneum. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 28: 856–861.
    1. Clay, J. S., W. E. Vinson and J. M. White, 1979. Heterogeneity of daughter variances of sires for milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 62: 985–989.
    1. Debat, V., and P. David, 2001. Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 555–561.

Publication types