Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan 28;13(4):633-6.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i4.633.

Diagnosis and management of colonic injuries following blunt trauma

Affiliations

Diagnosis and management of colonic injuries following blunt trauma

Yi-Xiong Zheng et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To retrospectively evaluate the preoperative diagnostic approaches and management of colonic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma.

Methods: A total of 82 patients with colonic injuries caused by blunt trauma between January 1992 and December 2005 were enrolled. Data were collected on clinical presentation, investigations, diagnostic methods, associated injuries, and operative management. Colonic injury-related mortality and abdominal complications were analyzed.

Results: Colonic injuries were caused mainly by motor vehicle accidents. Of the 82 patients, 58 (70.3%) had other associated injuries. Laparotomy was performed within 6 h after injury in 69 cases (84.1%), laparoscopy in 3 because of haemodynamic instability. The most commonly injured site was located in the transverse colon. The mean colon injury scale score was 2.8. The degree of faecal contamination was classified as mild in 18 (22.0%), moderate in 42 (51.2%), severe in 14 (17.1%), and unknown in 8 (9.8%) cases. Sixty-seven patients (81.7%) were treated with primary repair or resection and anastomosis. Faecal stream diversion was performed in 15 cases (18.3%). The overall mortality rate was 6.1%. The incidence of colonic injury-related abdominal complications was 20.7%. The only independent predictor of complications was the degree of peritoneal faecal contamination (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Colonic injuries following blunt trauma are especially important because of the severity and complexity of associated injuries. A thorough physical examination and a combination of tests can be used to evaluate the indications for laparotomy. One stage management at the time of initial exploration is most often used for colonic injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outcome of 82 patients with colonic injuries. S = survived, D = died.

References

    1. Tzovaras G, Hatzitheofilou C. New trends in the management of colonic trauma. Injury. 2005;36:1011–1015. - PubMed
    1. Bowley DM, Boffard KD, Goosen J, Bebington BD, Plani F. Evolving concepts in the management of colonic injury. Injury. 2001;32:435–439. - PubMed
    1. Cleary RK, Pomerantz RA, Lampman RM. Colon and rectal injuries. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1203–1222. - PubMed
    1. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Jurkovich GJ, Champion HR, Gennarelli TA, McAninch JW, Pachter HL, Shackford SR, Trafton PG. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma. 1990;30:1427–1429. - PubMed
    1. Xu SM, Zheng YX, Gong WH, Wang P. Management of colorectal injuries. Zhonghua Putong Waike Zazhi. 2004;19:337–339.