Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans
- PMID: 17278506
- DOI: 10.1118/1.2400842
Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans
Abstract
This work evaluates: (i) the size of random and systematic setup errors that can be absorbed by 5 mm clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins in prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT); (ii) agreement between simulation results and published margin recipes; and (iii) whether shifting contours with respect to a static dose distribution accurately predicts dose coverage due to setup errors. In 27 IMRT treatment plans created with 5 mm CTV-to-PTV margins, random setup errors with standard deviations (SDs) of 1.5, 3, 5 and 10 mm were simulated by fluence convolution. Systematic errors with identical SDs were simulated using two methods: (a) shifting the isocenter and recomputing dose (isocenter shift), and (b) shifting patient contours with respect to the static dose distribution (contour shift). Maximum tolerated setup errors were evaluated such that 90% of plans had target coverage equal to the planned PTV coverage. For coverage criteria consistent with published margin formulas, plans with 5 mm margins were found to absorb combined random and systematic SDs = 3 mm. Published recipes require margins of 8-10 mm for 3 mm SDs. For the prostate IMRT cases presented here a 5 mm margin would suffice, indicating that published recipes may be pessimistic. We found significant errors in individual plan doses given by the contour shift method. However, dose population plots (DPPs) given by the contour shift method agreed with the isocenter shift method for all structures except the nodal CTV and small bowel. For the nodal CTV, contour shift DPP differences were due to the structure moving outside the patient. Small bowel DPP errors were an artifact of large relative differences at low doses. Estimating individual plan doses by shifting contours with respect to a static dose distribution is not recommended. However, approximating DPPs is acceptable, provided care is taken with structures such as the nodal CTV which lie close to the surface.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):569-75. doi: 10.1118/1.2826558. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 18383678 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):422-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.029. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. PMID: 16168835
-
Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):550-63. doi: 10.1118/1.3273063. Med Phys. 2010. PMID: 20229863 Free PMC article.
-
Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.Phys Med Biol. 2007 Apr 7;52(7):1967-90. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/013. Epub 2007 Mar 20. Phys Med Biol. 2007. PMID: 17374922
-
[Practice of virtual simulation at the Saint-André hospital].Cancer Radiother. 1997;1(5):581-6. doi: 10.1016/s1278-3218(97)89647-3. Cancer Radiother. 1997. PMID: 9587392 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.Med Phys. 2015 Sep;42(9):5435-43. doi: 10.1118/1.4928490. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26328992 Free PMC article.
-
A deliverable four-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning method for dynamic multileaf collimator tumor tracking delivery.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1526-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.018. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. PMID: 18640500 Free PMC article.
-
Patient specific respiratory motion modeling using a 3D patient's external surface.Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3386-95. doi: 10.1118/1.4718578. Med Phys. 2012. PMID: 22755719 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical adequacy assessment of autocontours for prostate IMRT with meaningful endpoints.Med Phys. 2017 Apr;44(4):1525-1537. doi: 10.1002/mp.12158. Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28196288 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):569-75. doi: 10.1118/1.2826558. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 18383678 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical