The placebo effect: "relatively large" and "robust" enough to survive another assault
- PMID: 17279522
- DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20350
The placebo effect: "relatively large" and "robust" enough to survive another assault
Abstract
The evidence related to the placebo effect is discussed, and it is emphasized that the descriptors "relatively large" and "robust" are appropriate in the context in which they were used. Basic science and clinical trials, when interpreted properly, have revealed that the placebo effect is indeed a real phenomenon. J. Hunsley and R. Westmacott (this issue) as well as A. Hróbjartsson and P. C. Gøtzsche (this issue) are concerned that B. E. Wampold, T. Minami, S. C. Tierney, T. W. Baskin, and K. S. Bhati (2005) overstated the clinical effects of placebo when it was never B. E. Wampold et al.'s (2005) intention to make inferences about clinical utility; however, it is shown that the placebo effect exceeds many accepted medical interventions.
Comment on
-
Interpreting the magnitude of the placebo effect: mountain or Molehill?J Clin Psychol. 2007 Apr;63(4):391-9. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20352. J Clin Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17279525
-
Powerful spin in the conclusion of Wampold et al.'s re-analysis of placebo versus no-treatment trials despite similar results as in original review.J Clin Psychol. 2007 Apr;63(4):373-7. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20357. J Clin Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17279532
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
