Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;49(6):505-14.
doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0211-7. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

Sinus pericranii: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in 15 patients

Affiliations

Sinus pericranii: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in 15 patients

Carlo Gandolfo et al. Neuroradiology. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Sinus pericranii (SP) is a rare, usually asymptomatic condition characterized by a large communication between the intra- and the extracranial venous drainage pathways in which blood may circulate bidirectionally through dilated veins of the skull. We describe our diagnostic and therapeutic experience with SP, with a special focus on the vascular analysis of digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: DSA images of 15 patients were evaluated with regard to the delay in opacification of the scalp vessels, the absence or distortion of the superficial cortical veins in the vicinity of the SP, the drainage patterns of the superior sagittal sinus, and the degree of maturation of the venous outlets of the brain. SP were classified either as "dominant", if the main stream of contrast flow used the SP to drain the brain bypassing usual venous outlets, or as "accessory", if only a small part of the venous outflow occurred through the extradiploic vessels.

Results: All patients presented with a nonpulsatile, soft-tissue mass. The lesion was on the midline in 14 of 15 patients, frontal in 12 patients, and parietal in 2 patients. In 13 patients, associated intracranial venous anomalies were present, eight of which were developmental venous anomalies. Seven patients had a dominant SP, and eight an accessory SP.

Conclusion: SP can be considered the cutaneous sign of an underlying venous anomaly. If treatment is contemplated, analysis of the drainage pattern of the SP has to be performed. Treatment should be avoided in dominant SP or if its accessory role constitutes the only collateral pathway of an underlying venous anomaly.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Neurol. 1989 Nov;32(5):382-6 - PubMed
    1. Surg Neurol. 1993 Jan;39(1):41-5 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997 Dec;27(6):325-8 - PubMed
    1. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004 Aug;20(8-9):526-37 - PubMed
    1. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1991 May;31(5):287-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources