Communicating about haemophilia within the family: the importance of context and of experience
- PMID: 17286773
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01417.x
Communicating about haemophilia within the family: the importance of context and of experience
Abstract
This study examines communication within families affected by haemophilia, focusing especially on communication about carrier status. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with family members in the UK revealed recurrent patterns in communication strategies and styles. Participants drew a marked contrast between the nature of communication within the clinic and within the home. In families, it is notable that communication usually occurs within the context of concrete experience of the condition. Noticeable differences existed in families with obligate carriers when compared with families with non-obligate carrier daughters. In families with affected sons, daughters may have more experience of haemophilia and consequently more understanding of their possible carrier status than in families with an affected father. Families also typically make value judgements and comments on coping strategies when they communicate about the condition. Readiness to receive information is very variable, and depends upon factors such as personality and life stage. Information may seem to be successfully communicated but the recipient may sometimes actually comprehend much less, only understanding more fully later or when the information becomes directly relevant to them. Periodic checking of understanding of different family members, and the provision of written information, may be helpful.
Similar articles
-
Communication about carrier testing within hemophilia A families.Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15;119C(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10001. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003. PMID: 12704632
-
Health first, genetics second: exploring families' experiences of communicating genetic information.Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 Nov;16(11):1329-35. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.104. Epub 2008 May 21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008. PMID: 18493266
-
Communicating cancer diagnosis and prognosis: when the target is the elderly patient-a GIOGer study.Eur J Cancer. 2009 Feb;45(3):374-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Oct 4. Eur J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 18838268
-
Family communication during the cancer experience.J Health Commun. 2009;14 Suppl 1:76-84. doi: 10.1080/10810730902806844. J Health Commun. 2009. PMID: 19449271 Review.
-
Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Jun;15(6):612-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201822. Epub 2007 Mar 28. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007. PMID: 17392704 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding of genetic inheritance among Xhosa-speaking caretakers of children with hemophilia.J Genet Couns. 2012 Oct;21(5):726-40. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9495-9. Epub 2012 Mar 10. J Genet Couns. 2012. PMID: 22407306
-
Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study.J Genet Couns. 2016 Dec;25(6):1257-1266. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9964-7. Epub 2016 May 19. J Genet Couns. 2016. PMID: 27193897
-
Adolescent carrier testing in practice: the impact of legal rulings and problems with "gillick competence".J Genet Couns. 2008 Dec;17(6):509-21. doi: 10.1007/s10897-008-9168-x. Epub 2008 Aug 29. J Genet Couns. 2008. PMID: 18758928
-
"It was a lot Tougher than I Thought It would be". A Qualitative Study on the Changing Nature of Being a Hemophilia Carrier.J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1324-1332. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0112-9. Epub 2017 May 26. J Genet Couns. 2017. PMID: 28547664
-
Informing children of their newborn screening carrier result for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of parents' intentions, views and support needs.J Genet Couns. 2014 Jun;23(3):409-20. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9675-2. Epub 2013 Dec 4. J Genet Couns. 2014. PMID: 24306142
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical