Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;173(4):832-840.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01959.x.

Stomatal deregulation in Plasmopara viticola-infected grapevine leaves

Affiliations
Free article

Stomatal deregulation in Plasmopara viticola-infected grapevine leaves

Mathilde Allègre et al. New Phytol. 2007.
Free article

Abstract

In grapevine, the penetration and sporulation of Plasmopara viticola occur via stomata, suggesting functional relationships between guard cells and the pathogen. This assumption was supported by our first observation that grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Marselan) cuttings infected by P. viticola wilted more rapidly than healthy ones when submitted to water starvation. Here, complementary approaches measuring stomatal conductance and infrared thermographic and microscopic observations were used to investigate stomatal opening/closure in response to infection. In infected leaves, stomata remained open in darkness and during water stress, leading to increased transpiration. This deregulation was restricted to the colonized area, was not systemic and occurred before the appearance of symptoms. Cytological observations indicated that stomatal lock-open was not related to mechanical forces resulting from the presence of the pathogen in the substomatal cavity. In contrast to healthy leaves, stomatal closure in excised infected leaves could not be induced by a water deficit or abscisic acid (ABA) treatment. However, ABA induced stomatal closure in epidermal peels from infected leaves, indicating that guard cells remained functional. These data indicate that the oomycete deregulates guard cell functioning, causing significant water losses. This effect could be attributed to a nonsystemic compound, produced by the oomycete or by the infected plant, which inhibits stomatal closure or induces stomatal opening; or a reduction of the back-pressure exerted by surrounding epidermal cells. Both hypotheses are under investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Assmann SM. 1993. Signal transduction in guard cells. Annual Review of Cell Biology 9: 345-375.
    1. Ayres PG. 1981. Responses of stomata to pathogenic microorganisms. In: Jarvis PG, Mansfield TA, eds. Stomatal physiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 205-221.
    1. Aziz A, Poinssot B, Daire X, Adrian M, Bezier A, Lambert B, Joubert JM, Pugin A. 2003. Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 16: 1118-1128.
    1. Ballio A, D’Alessio V, Randazzo G, Bottalico G, Graniti A, Sparapano L, Bosnar B, Casinovi CG, Gribanovski-Sassu O. 1976. Occurrence of fusicoccin in plant tissues infected by Fusicoccum amygdali Del. Physiological Plant Pathology 8: 163-169.
    1. Bassanezi RB, Amorim L, Bergamin Filho A, Berger RD. 2002. Gas exchange and emission of chlorophyll fluorescence during the monocycle of rust, angular leaf spot and anthracnose of bean leaves as a function of their trophic characteristics. Journal of Phytopathology 150: 37-47.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources