Apolipoprotein E and traumatic brain injury in a military population: evidence of a neuropsychological compensatory mechanism?
- PMID: 17287237
- PMCID: PMC2117544
- DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.108183
Apolipoprotein E and traumatic brain injury in a military population: evidence of a neuropsychological compensatory mechanism?
Abstract
Objective: Although research has implicated the apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon-4 genotype as having a negative effect on neuropsychological outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI), the potentially negative role of the epsilon4 allele on TBI outcomes has recently been challenged. In light of this debate, the present study served to examine the role of APOE genotype on neuropsychological outcomes approximately 1 month following mild to moderate TBI in a military population. Because of the well documented role of the APOE-epsilon4 allele in increasing the risk of Alzheimer's disease, we predicted that persons with the APOE-epsilon4 genotype would display relatively greater deficits in cognition than their non-epsilon4 counterparts.
Methods: 78 participants were consecutively recruited following a mild to moderate TBI and were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of an APOE epsilon4 allele. Groups were comparable on demographic characteristics and psychosocial outcomes. Participants were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery.
Results: Analyses revealed comparable performances on most neuropsychological measures and better performances by epsilon4 carriers on select measures of attention, executive functioning and episodic memory encoding. Furthermore, differences remained after accounting for the effects of TBI severity.
Conclusions: Evidence from these analyses supports current literature refuting the notion of relatively poorer neuropsychological functioning associated with the APOE-epsilon4 genotype among young adult participants shortly following mild or moderate brain injury. Neuropsychological performance differences by APOE genotype following TBI are discussed in terms of the importance of considering severity of injury, timing of postinjury assessment and possible neurocognitive compensatory mechanisms.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Dr Delis is a co‐author of the D‐KEFS (Delis–Kaplan Executive Functions System) and receives royalties from the test. There were no other actual or potential conflicts of interest for the authors that could have inappropriately influenced the present work. Subjects were recruited in accordance with Internal Review Board (IRB) approved policies and procedures. Standard professional and ethical guidelines were upheld during the research study and manuscript preparation. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the funding agency, the United States Navy, the United States Marine Corps, the Department of Defense or the United States Government.
References
-
- Dikmen S S, Machamer J E, Winn H R.et al Neuropsychological outcome at 1‐year post head injury. Neuropsychology 1995980–90.
-
- Levin H S, Benton A L, Grossman R G.Neurobehavioral consequences of closed head injury. New York: Oxford Press, 1982
-
- Brooks D N. Long and short term memory in head injured patients. Cortex 197511329–340. - PubMed
-
- Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. Lancet 19742995–997. - PubMed
-
- McAllister T W. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of head injuries. Psychiatr Clin North Am 199215395–412. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous