Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb 8:2:4.
doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-4.

Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study

Affiliations

Are upright lateral cervical radiographs in the obtunded trauma patient useful? A retrospective study

Craig H Rabb et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Background: The best method for radiographic "clearance" of the cervical spine in obtunded patients prior to removal of cervical immobilization devices remains debated. Dynamic radiographs or MRI are thought to demonstrate unstable injuries, but can be expensive and cumbersome to obtain. An upright lateral cervical radiograph (ULCR) was performed in selected patients to investigate whether this study could provide this same information, to enable removal of cervical immobilization devices in the multiple trauma patient.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with ULCR in 683 blunt trauma victims who presented over a 3-year period, with either a Glasgow Coma Score <13 or who were intubated at the time of presentation.

Results: ULCR was performed in 163 patients. Seven patients had studies interpreted to be abnormal, of which six were also abnormal, by either CT or MRI. The seventh patient's only abnormality was soft tissue swelling; MRI was otherwise normal. Six patients had ULCR interpreted as normal, but had abnormalities on either CT or MRI. None of the missed injuries required surgical stabilization, although one had a vertebral artery injury demonstrated on subsequent angiography. ULCR had an apparent sensitivity of 45.5% and specificity of 71.4%.

Conclusion: ULCR are inferior to both CT and MRI in the detection of cervical injury in patients with normal plain radiographs. We therefore cannot recommend the use of ULCR in the obtunded trauma patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58:902–5. - PubMed
    1. Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC. The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 1993;34:342–6. - PubMed
    1. Hadley MN, Walters BC, Grabb PA, Oyesiku NM, Przybylski GJ, Resnick DK, Ryken TC. Radiographic assessment of the cervical spine in symptomatic trauma patients. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:S36–S43. - PubMed
    1. Lewis LM, Docherty M, Ruoff BE, Fortney JP, Keltner RA, Jr, Britton P. Flexion-extension views in the evaluation of cervical-spine injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:117–21. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81205-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freedman I, van Gelderen D, Cooper DJ, Fitzgerald M, Malham G, Rosenfeld JV, Varma D, Kossmann T. Cervical Spine Assessment in the Unconscious Trauma Patient: A Major Trauma Service's Experience with Passive Flexion-Extension Radiography. J Trauma. 2005;58:1183–1188. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources