Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices
- PMID: 17289322
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.034
Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices
Abstract
Aim: To compare BMD values of lumbar and hip regions measured in two different DXA scanners in one laboratory, and to investigate the efficiencies of implemented and specifically derived standardization formulas.
Materials and methods: PA lumbar (L2-L4) and right femoral neck BMD values were obtained in 100 women (aged 26-75), consecutively in GE-Lunar DPX-NT and Hologic QDR 4500 C DXA scanners. Standardization of BMD values obtained in two different DXA devices was done according to the method developed by International DXA Standardization Committee (IDSC), using the European Spine Phantom (ESP) to obtain the specific constant value. Mean corrected standardized BMD (sBMD) values in two scanners have been compared with each other and with the mean reported sBMD values, respectively.
Results: The mean lumbar BMD values were 0.950+/-0.117 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 1.068+/-0.135 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p<0.05); mean corrected sBMD values were 1.035+/-0.128 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 1.035+/-0.131 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p>0.05). The mean femoral neck BMD values were 0.798+/-0.114 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 0.895+/-0.111 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p<0.05); mean corrected sBMD values were 0.869+/-0.124 g/cm(2) for Hologic and 0.867+/-0.108 g/cm(2) for GE-Lunar (p>0.05). The difference between the mean values of BMD and sBMD, both corrected and reported, were statistically important in each scanner (p<0.05). The mean values of corrected and reported sBMD were also statistically different in each scanner (p<0.05; mean standard error in the spine was 1.3 for GE-Lunar and 1.8 for the Hologic device).
Conclusion: The originally proposed standardization formulae may not optimally correct for manufacturer, model and device-specific differences. Therefore, use of sBMD is not recommended to compare results of individual patients obtained on scanners of different type and brand. The residual error of reported sBMD, however, is substantially smaller than for manufacturer-specific results, and therefore, reporting standardized results is useful for population studies.
Similar articles
-
Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jul;21(7):1227-36. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1062-3. Epub 2009 Oct 27. Osteoporos Int. 2010. PMID: 19859644 Free PMC article.
-
Gender disparity in BMD conversion: a comparison between Lunar and Hologic densitometers.Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:180. doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0180-5. Epub 2014 May 8. Arch Osteoporos. 2014. PMID: 25527404 Clinical Trial.
-
Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Oct;9(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091002. J Bone Miner Res. 1994. PMID: 7817795 Clinical Trial.
-
In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients.J Clin Densitom. 2014 Jan-Mar;17(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 26. J Clin Densitom. 2014. PMID: 23896494 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.Osteoporos Int. 2002 Dec;13(12):948-54. doi: 10.1007/s001980200132. Osteoporos Int. 2002. PMID: 12459937
Cited by
-
Measurement Uncertainty in Spine Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.J Bone Metab. 2017 May;24(2):105-109. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.2.105. Epub 2017 May 31. J Bone Metab. 2017. PMID: 28642854 Free PMC article.
-
Association between Deltoid Muscle Density and Proximal Humeral Fracture in Elderly Patients.Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Jul 3;16:94103. doi: 10.52965/001c.94103. eCollection 2024. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024. PMID: 38974660 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.Calcif Tissue Int. 2022 Nov;111(5):475-484. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-01012-9. Epub 2022 Jul 29. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022. PMID: 35902385
-
Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Nov;39(11):1109-16. doi: 10.1007/s00256-009-0828-1. Epub 2009 Nov 20. Skeletal Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19924413
-
Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jul;21(7):1227-36. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1062-3. Epub 2009 Oct 27. Osteoporos Int. 2010. PMID: 19859644 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials