Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007;31(1):59-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.11.001. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

Hypermethylation of the CpG islands in the promoter region flanking GSTP1 gene is a potential plasma DNA biomarker for detecting prostate carcinoma

Affiliations

Hypermethylation of the CpG islands in the promoter region flanking GSTP1 gene is a potential plasma DNA biomarker for detecting prostate carcinoma

Cheng-Keng Chuang et al. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the possibility of identifying DNA hypermethylation in the circulation of prostate cancer patients.

Methods: Plasma DNA samples were extracted from 36 prostate cancer patients and 27 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) cases. After extensive methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion, the DNA samples were subjected to the real-time quantitative PCR amplification. Dissociation curve analysis was applied to determine if hypermethylation occurred in the promoter region flanking the GSTP1 gene, a well-documented epigenetic event among prostate cancer cells, in these plasma DNA samples.

Results: 11 of 36 prostate cancer patients showed positive peak pattern, indicating methylation changes occurred. Concordant data were obtained from the corresponding paraffin-embedded tissue samples available from the Tumor Bank. Twenty-five of the 27 BPH cases showed negative results, suggesting no methylation changes happened in the CpG islands in these cases.

Conclusions: We have successfully identified prostate cancer genome hypermethylation in the peripheral circulation in prostate cancer patients with this protocol. This method can effectively distinguish BPH from prostate neoplasm. Although a larger number of samples are necessary to validate the capability of the protocol in practice, using plasma DNA sample is an ideal non-invasive approach for prostate neoplasm detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types