Protecting new ideas and inventions in nanomedicine with patents
- PMID: 17292072
- DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2005.03.009
Protecting new ideas and inventions in nanomedicine with patents
Abstract
New paradigms are shrinking our world. Tiny is in and patents are essential for success in nanomedicine. In fact, patents are already shaping this nascent and rapidly evolving field. For the past decade a swarm of patent applications pertaining to nanomedicine has been arriving at the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). As companies develop products and processes and begin to seek commercial applications for their inventions, securing valid and defensible patent protection will be vital to their long-term survival. As we enter the "golden era" of medicine, or nanomedicine, in the next decade with the field maturing and the promised breakthroughs accruing, patents will generate licensing revenue, provide leverage in deals and mergers, and reduce the likelihood of infringement. Because development of nanobiotechnology- and nanomedicine-related products is extremely research intensive, without the market exclusivity offered by a US patent, development of these products and their commercial viability in the marketplace will be significantly hampered. In this article, we highlight critical issues relating to patenting nanomedicine products. Effects of the "nanopatent land grab" that is underway in nanomedicine by "patent prospectors" are examined as startups and corporations compete to lock up broad patents in these critical early days. Because nanomedicine is multidisciplinary, patenting presents unique opportunities and poses numerous challenges. Although patents are being sought more actively and enforced more vigorously, the entire patent system is under greater scrutiny and strain, with the PTO continuing to struggle with evaluating nanomedicine-related patent applications.
Similar articles
-
Patents and nanomedicine.Nanomedicine (Lond). 2007 Jun;2(3):351-74. doi: 10.2217/17435889.2.3.351. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2007. PMID: 17716180 Review.
-
Will the nanomedicine "patent land grab" thwart commercialization?Nanomedicine. 2005 Dec;1(4):346-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2005.10.009. Nanomedicine. 2005. PMID: 17292108 Review. No abstract available.
-
Patenting nanotechnology.Stanford Law Rev. 2005 Nov;58(2):601-30. Stanford Law Rev. 2005. PMID: 16395838
-
The impact of effective patents on future innovations in nanomedicine.Pharm Pat Anal. 2012 Mar;1(1):37-43. doi: 10.4155/ppa.11.4. Pharm Pat Anal. 2012. PMID: 24236712
-
Implications of recent US Supreme Court IP ruling for nanomedicine patents.Nanomedicine (Lond). 2008 Apr;3(2):141-3. doi: 10.2217/17435889.3.2.141. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2008. PMID: 18373420 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Centre and Periphery of Nano-A Norwegian Context.Nanoethics. 2011 Apr;5(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s11569-011-0110-6. Epub 2011 Mar 27. Nanoethics. 2011. PMID: 21603038 Free PMC article.
-
Defining Nano, Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine: Why Should It Matter?Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1255-1276. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9705-6. Epub 2015 Sep 15. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26373718
-
The potential of nanomedicine therapies to treat neovascular disease in the retina.J Angiogenes Res. 2010 Oct 8;2:21. doi: 10.1186/2040-2384-2-21. J Angiogenes Res. 2010. PMID: 20932321 Free PMC article.
-
Current Trends and Challenges in the Clinical Translation of Nanoparticulate Nanomedicines: Pathways for Translational Development and Commercialization.Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jul 17;9:790. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00790. eCollection 2018. Front Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 30065653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical and legal challenges in nanomedical innovations: a scoping review.Front Genet. 2023 May 12;14:1163392. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1163392. eCollection 2023. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 37252668 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous