Assessment of upper gastrointestinal safety of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison
- PMID: 17292766
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60234-7
Assessment of upper gastrointestinal safety of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison
Abstract
Background: Upper gastrointestinal safety of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitors versus traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has not been assessed in trials that simulate standard clinical practice. Our aim was to assess the effects of these drugs on gastrointestinal outcomes in a population that includes patients taking gastrointestinal protective therapy.
Methods: A prespecified pooled intent-to-treat analysis of three double-blind randomised comparisons of etoricoxib (60 or 90 mg daily) and diclofenac (150 mg daily) in 34 701 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis was done for upper gastrointestinal clinical events (bleeding, perforation, obstruction, or ulcer) and the subset of complicated events (perforation, obstruction, witnessed ulcer bleeding, or significant bleeding). We also assessed such outcomes in patients who were taking concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or low-dose aspirin. These trials are registered with , with the numbers , , and .
Findings: Overall upper gastrointestinal clinical events were significantly less common with etoricoxib than with diclofenac (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83; p=0.0001). There were significantly fewer uncomplicated gastrointestinal events with etoricoxib than there were with diclofenac (0.57, 0.45-0.74; p<0.0001); there was no difference in complicated events (0.91, 0.67-1.24; p=0.561). PPIs were used concomitantly for at least 75% of the study period by 13 862 (40%) and low-dose aspirin by 11 418 (33%) patients; treatment effects did not differ significantly in these individuals.
Interpretation: There were significantly fewer upper gastrointestinal clinical events with the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib than with the traditional NSAID diclofenac due to a decrease in uncomplicated events, but not in the more serious complicated events. The reduction in uncomplicated events with etoricoxib is maintained in patients treated with PPIs and is also observed with regular low-dose aspirin use.
Comment in
-
Do COX-2 inhibitors give enough gastrointestinal protection?Lancet. 2007 Feb 10;369(9560):439-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60206-2. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17292743 No abstract available.
-
Gastrointestinal safety of NSAIDs versus COX-2 inhibitors.Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1343-1344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60626-6. Lancet. 2007. PMID: 17448812 No abstract available.
-
Are COX-2 selective inhibitors safer than NSAIDs for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis?Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Dec;4(12):648-9. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0963. Epub 2007 Oct 16. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17940520 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) programme: a randomised comparison.Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1771-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69666-9. Lancet. 2006. PMID: 17113426
-
The gastrointestinal safety of the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib assessed by both endoscopy and analysis of upper gastrointestinal events.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;98(8):1725-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07598.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12907325 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical trial design and patient demographics of the Multinational Etoricoxib and Diclofenac Arthritis Long-term (MEDAL) study program: cardiovascular outcomes with etoricoxib versus diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.Am Heart J. 2006 Aug;152(2):237-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.024. Am Heart J. 2006. PMID: 16875903
-
[Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib and diclofenac on the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis (the multinational etoricoxib and diclofenac arthritis long-term (MEDAL) study program)].Ter Arkh. 2010;82(8):57-62. Ter Arkh. 2010. PMID: 20873248 Review. Russian.
-
Global gastrointestinal safety profile of etoricoxib and lumiracoxib.Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13(22):2237-47. doi: 10.2174/138161207781368792. Curr Pharm Des. 2007. PMID: 17691997 Review.
Cited by
-
NSAIDs and the gastrointestinal tract.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2009 Oct;11(5):345-53. doi: 10.1007/s11894-009-0053-z. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2009. PMID: 19765361
-
Prevention of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: current controversies and clinical guidance.Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2013 Sep;4(5):206-22. doi: 10.1177/2040622313492188. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2013. PMID: 23997925 Free PMC article.
-
Are All Oral COX-2 Selective Inhibitors the Same? A Consideration of Celecoxib, Etoricoxib, and Diclofenac.Int J Rheumatol. 2018 Dec 9;2018:1302835. doi: 10.1155/2018/1302835. eCollection 2018. Int J Rheumatol. 2018. PMID: 30631366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Value of information in the osteoarthritis setting: cost effectiveness of COX-2 selective inhibitors, traditional NSAIDs and proton pump inhibitors.Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Mar;29(3):225-37. doi: 10.2165/11584200-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011. PMID: 21062104
-
A review of the gastrointestinal safety data--a gastroenterologist's perspective.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 May;49 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii3-10. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq058. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010. PMID: 20407138 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials