Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;92(6):505-8.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.106070. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

Acceptability of perinatal rapid point-of-care HIV testing in an area of low HIV prevalence in the UK

Suzy H M Stokes  1 , Paddy McMaster, Khaled M K Ismail
Affiliations

Acceptability of perinatal rapid point-of-care HIV testing in an area of low HIV prevalence in the UK

Suzy H M Stokes et al. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the uptake of current antenatal HIV testing, the prevalence of risk factors for HIV in pregnant women and the acceptability of the rapid point-of-care HIV test (RPOCT) among pregnant women and their midwives.

Design: A retrospective review of 717 notes to determine current HIV screening practices and a cross-sectional survey using a self-completed questionnaire for pregnant women and midwives.

Setting: The antenatal clinic (ANC) and postnatal wards (PNW) at a university teaching hospital in the West Midlands.

Participants: 486 women attending the ANC or admitted to the PNW during a fortnight in May-June 2006. 72 midwives on the delivery ward completed a second questionnaire.

Results: The questionnaire showed that 90.4% of those offered the standard HIV test accepted it, with 7.2% having at least one risk factor for HIV. Over half of the decliners perceived themselves as not at risk. 85.2% would accept the rapid test, including 35.6% of the decliners. 92.8% of midwives agreed/strongly agreed the RPOCT has a role on the delivery ward and 97.2% would be happy to offer the test with appropriate training and guidance.

Conclusions: Midwives deem the RPOCT to be appropriate for a variety of perinatal settings. It is also acceptable to a clinically significant proportion of those who decline the standard test (21 of 59) and therefore has the potential to increase screening and detection rates. Hence, by allowing early diagnosis and the initiation of antenatal interventions, it could reduce the rate of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) in the UK.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. RCPCH British Paediatric Surveillance Unit 19th Annual Report 2004–2005. www.bpsu.inopsu.com (accessed 15 March 2007)
    1. Sanders G, Bayoumi A, Sundaram V.et al Cost‐effectiveness of screening for HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med 2005352570–585. - PubMed
    1. Bulterys M, Jamieson D, O'Sullivan M.et al Rapid HIV‐1 testing during labor. A multicenter study. JAMA 2004292(2)219–223. - PubMed
    1. Cohen M, Olszewski Y, Branson B.et al Using point of care testing to make rapid HIV‐1 tests in labour really rapid. AIDS 200317(14)2121–2124. - PubMed
    1. Liu A, Kilmarx P, Supawitkul S.et al Rapid whole‐blood finger‐stick test for HIV antibody: performance and acceptability among women in Northern Thailand. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 200333(2)194–198. - PubMed