Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Mar;46(3):257-8, 260-3.
doi: 10.1007/s00120-007-1300-2.

[New techniques for surgical treatment of postoperative male stress incontinence]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[New techniques for surgical treatment of postoperative male stress incontinence]

[Article in German]
S Bross et al. Urologe A. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

The impact of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of postoperative male incontinence has significantly improved in recent years. These techniques are based on the continuous increase in urethral resistance. This resistance can be readjusted with balloons placed paraurethrally or with readjustable suburethral slings. The success rates depend on the preoperative degree of incontinence. With bulking agents that are transurethrally injected into the submucosa of the sphincter, continence rates between 12 and 90% can be seen. Severe complications are rare. The impact of the studies is often limited due to a short follow-up. After implantation of adjustable balloons that are placed paraurethrally close to the bladder neck, continence rates up to 70% can be seen. The overall improvement of incontinence is observed in up to 90% of the treated patients. Complications such as balloon migration or mechanical disorders can cause operative revision. Suburethral sling systems are available as bone-anchored slings or as readjustable slings. Continence can be seen in up to 90% of the patients postoperatively. Severe complications such as sling erosion or sling infection are rare. In cases of mild and moderate incontinence, these minimally invasive techniques are good alternatives to the fascial sling or alloplastic sphincter implantation. To improve the evaluation and to compare these techniques with the conventional methods, further investigations with a longer follow-up are necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):58-61 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999 Dec;33(6):355-61 - PubMed
    1. Int J Urol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1207-11 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2005 Feb;47(2):209-13 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1937-41 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources