Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb 13;49(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-5.

Reproductive performance of Norwegian cattle from 1985 to 2005: trends and seasonality

Affiliations

Reproductive performance of Norwegian cattle from 1985 to 2005: trends and seasonality

Arne Ola Refsdal. Acta Vet Scand. .

Abstract

Declining reproductive performance is a serious breeding concern in many countries. To reveal the situation in Norwegian cattle, trends in reproductive performance were studied using insemination reports from 1985 to 2005 and data based on herd recording files from 1989 to 2005. The total number of first services was 469.765 in 1985 declining to 335.712 in 2005. The number of recorded herds and animals declined from 21.588 to 14.718 and 360.289 to 309.452 from 1989 to 2005, respectively. Sixty days non-return rate after single inseminations (NR60) increased from 68.1 in 1985 to 72.7% in 2005 (p < 0.001) and the number of services per inseminated animal (NIA) decreased from 1.8 to 1.6 (p < 0.001) from 1985 to 2005. However, return rates 0-3 days post insemination (RR0-3) increased from 6 to 12% in the same period (p < 0.001). NR60 was higher and the RR0-3 was lower in the summer season compared to the winter season during the whole period. A fertility index (FS), has been calculated from the herd recording files each year from 1989 to 2005. The average FS-index did not show a significant trend and the calving interval was also fairly constant between 12.4 and 12.6 months during this period. The average interval from calving to first and last insemination, respectively, increased from a low of 79 and 102 days in 1990 to a high of 86 and 108 days in 2005. Both intervals were consistently longer for cows in first lactation than for cows in later lactations. The percentage of inseminated animals reported culled because of poor fertility decreased from 6.0% in 1989 to 4.6% in 1996 and thereafter again increased to 6% in 2005. In conclusion, most fertility measures, mainly comprising the Norwegian Red (NRF) breed, show a relatively high level of reproductive performance with a positive or a relatively constant trend during the last two decades.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total number of first inseminations (■) and percentages of inseminations performed with semen from bulls of the NRF breed (□) every 5th year from 1985 to 2005.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Seasonal distribution of first inseminations every 5th year from 1985 to 2005.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average interval from calving to first insemination (CFI) in first lactation (◆), later lactations (■) and for all cows (△).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average interval from calving to last insemination (CLI) in first lactation (◆), later lactations (■) and for all cows (△).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sixty days non return rates (NR60, □) and return rates within 3 days (RR0-3, ◆) from 1985 to 2005.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Sixty days non return rates by month every 5th year from 1985 to 2005.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Return rates within 3 days (RR0-3) by month every 5th year from 1985 to 2005.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Average FS-index (□) and calving interval (◆) from 1989 to 2005.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Percentages of inseminated animals reported culled because of poor fertility from 1989 to 2005.

References

    1. O'Farrell KJ. Changes in dairy cow fertility. Cattle Practice. 1998;6:387–392.
    1. Lucy MC. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:1277–1293. - PubMed
    1. Washburn SP, Silvia WJ, Brown CH, McDaniel BT, McAllister AJ. Trends in reproductive performance in Southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:244–251. - PubMed
    1. Rajala-Schultz PJ, Frazer GS. Reproductive performance in Ohio dairy herds in the 1990s. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;76:127–142. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00243-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDougall S. Reproduction performance and management of dairy cattle. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:185–194. doi: 10.1262/jrd.17091. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources