A twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, noninferiority trial of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of imidapril and candesartan in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the Iberian Multicenter Imidapril Study on Hypertension (IMISH)
- PMID: 17296460
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.006
A twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, noninferiority trial of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of imidapril and candesartan in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the Iberian Multicenter Imidapril Study on Hypertension (IMISH)
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the annhypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor imidapril and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist candesartan in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Methods: The trial was conducted at 8 centers across Portugal and Spain (the Iberian Multicenter Imidapril Study on Hypertension [IMISH] Study Group). Patients aged between 30 and 70 years with essential hypertension were eligible. Following a 2- to 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive imidapril at doses of up to 20 mg/d, or candesartan at doses up to 16 mg/d, once daily in a double-blind, parallel-group design with a 12-week active-treatment period. To achieve the target systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) of <140/<90 mm Hg, imidapril was titrated from 5 to 20 mg/d and candesartan was titrated from 4 to 16 mg/d. The main end point was the change from baseline in sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough. Secondary end points were response rate, evaluation of SBP and DBP throughout the study, and change of SBP and DBP in subgroup of patients with moderate hypertension, as well as incidence and severity of adverse events related to treatment reported throughout the study.
Results: The intent-to-treat analysis consisted of 122 patients (imidapril group, 60 patients; 32 men, 28 women; mean [SD] age, 54.7 [9.2] years; white race, 59 [99.2%], Hispanic race, 1 [0.8%]; mean [SD] weight, 80.1 [12.8] kg; candesartan group, 62 patients; 36 men, 26 women; mean [SD] age, 53.9 [9.9] years; white race, 62 [100%]; mean [SD] weight, 77.6 [14.1] kg). In the imidapril group, the mean (SD) SBP and DBP were, respectively, 155.7 (10.2) and 96.7 (4.7) mm Hg at baseline and 139.4 (11.9) and 86.9 (7.6) mm Hg at the end of the 12-week treatment period (visit 5); SBP had decreased significantly from baseline, by 10.5% (mean [SD] Delta, -16.3 [12.3] mm Hg [95% CI, -19.5 to -13.1; P < 0.001]) and DBP had decreased significantly, by 10.1% (mean [SD] A, -9.8 [7.8] mm Hg [95% CI, -11.8 to -7.8; P < 0.001]). In the candesartan group, the mean (SD) SBP and DBP values were, respectively, 158.4 [11.2] and 98.3 [4.1] mm Hg at baseline and 139.8 [12.5] and 87.6 7.5] mm Hg at 12 weeks, corresponding to decreases of 11.7% in SBP (mean [SD] A, -18.6 [12.8] mm Hg [95% CI, -21.9 to -15.4; P < 0.001]) and 10.9% in DBP (mean [SD] A, -10.7 [7.3] mm Hg [95% CI, -12.5 to -8.8; P < 0.001]). Response rates were 78.3% (47/60) with imidapril and 69.4% (43/62) with candesartan, and BP normalization (<140/<90 mm Hg) was achieved in 55.0% (33/60) of patients with imidapril and 45.2% (28/62) of patients with candesartan. The incidences of adverse events were similar between groups. Most (73.9%) adverse events were mild in intensity. A serious adverse event (severe anxiety) was reported in the candesartan group and led to study discontinuation. No cases of dry cough or hypotension were reported.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that imidapril once daily at doses up to 20 mg and candesartan once daily at doses up to 16 mg were effective in this population of mildly to moderately hypertensive patients. Both treatments were well tolerated.
Similar articles
-
A multicentre, 12-week study of imidapril and candesartan cilexetil in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(6):407-17. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727060-00004. Clin Drug Investig. 2007. PMID: 17506591 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol monotherapy by baseline systolic blood pressure: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.028. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19843484
-
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine besilate compared with candesartan cilexetil monotherapy and amlodipine besilate monotherapy in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.Clin Ther. 2012 Apr;34(4):838-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Clin Ther. 2012. PMID: 22440192 Clinical Trial.
-
Candesartan cilexetil: in children and adolescents aged 1 to <17 years with hypertension.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(5):335-42. doi: 10.2165/11206300-000000000-00000. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20860416 Review.
-
Effect of candesartan cilexetil on diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensive patients: meta-analysis of five randomized double-blind clinical trials.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):165-71. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007. PMID: 17583187 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Imidapril: a review of its use in essential hypertension, Type 1 diabetic nephropathy and chronic heart failure.Drugs. 2007;67(9):1359-78. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767090-00008. Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17547476 Review.
-
Blockade of brain angiotensin II AT1 receptors ameliorates stress, anxiety, brain inflammation and ischemia: Therapeutic implications.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Jan;36(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Oct 29. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011. PMID: 21035950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Angiotensin II AT(1) receptor blockers as treatments for inflammatory brain disorders.Clin Sci (Lond). 2012 Nov;123(10):567-90. doi: 10.1042/CS20120078. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012. PMID: 22827472 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Mar;33(3):188-201. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0138-y. Epub 2018 Dec 5. J Hum Hypertens. 2019. PMID: 30518809
-
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of depression among older people with hypertension.J Psychopharmacol. 2022 May;36(5):594-603. doi: 10.1177/02698811221082470. Epub 2022 Apr 7. J Psychopharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35388727 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical