Injection of acidic or neutral insulin and pain: a single-center, prospective, controlled, noninterventional study in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus
- PMID: 17296465
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.017
Injection of acidic or neutral insulin and pain: a single-center, prospective, controlled, noninterventional study in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background: Pain resulting from injections has a potential influence on the acceptance and thus on the success of insulin treatment. Systematic investigation in humans has suggested that individuals perceive more pain during SC injection of acidic solutions than neutral solutions. Insulin glargine is a long-acting (up to 24-hour duration of effect), parenteral blood glucose-lowering agent. Unlike other insulins, it is injected as an acidic solution (pH 4).
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether the SC injection of insulin glargine is more painful than neutral insulin in a clinical setting.
Methods: This single-center, prospective, controlled, noninterventional study was performed in consecutively enrolled male and female pediatric patients (7-21 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus who self-injected insulin >or=3 times per day and who had diabetes duration of >or=6 months. The study was conducted from September 1, 2005, to December 30, 2005, at the Diabetes Clinic, University Children's Hospital, Ulm, Germany. No changes to the patients' current insulin regimen were made. Based on their existing insulin treatment, patients were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: (1) the acidic insulin group, which injected insulin glargine, and (2) the neutral insulin group, which injected neutral protamine Hagedorn or Semilente insulin. All patients also injected shortacting regular insulin or insulin analogs. Pain during SC insulin injection and during self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (the internal control) was assessed using a standardized, noninterventional protocol and optimized combined 10-cm visual analog scale and 5-point verbal rating scale (minimum = I cannot feel it at all; maximum = it hurts me). Patients were instructed to document pain immediately after insulin injection and SMBG at home 3 times a day on 3 different days.
Results: A total of 112 patients (mean [SD] age, 14.6 [3.0] years; sex, 60 [53.6%] male; mean [SD] glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], 8.0% [1.4%]; mean [SD] diabetes duration, 6.1 [3.9] years) completed the study. Pain scores reported by the acidic group (n = 76) were not significantly different when compared with those of the neutral group (n = 36) (4.0 [2.0] vs 4.2 [1.9]). Pain scores were also similar for the injection of short-acting insulin in those from the acidic group when compared with those from the neutral group (3.7 [1.7] vs 4.1 [2.1]). Insulin injections were generally perceived as more painful than SMBG (3.9 [1.7] vs 2.9 [1.8]; P < 0.001). Using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, pain perception was determined to be independent of age, gender, HbA(1c) level, and duration of diabetes.
Conclusion: Despite its acidic formulation (pH 4), insulin glargine was not perceived as more painful during SC injection than neutral long-acting or shortacting insulin in these pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Similar articles
-
A randomized, controlled trial comparing twice-a-day insulin glargine mixed with rapid-acting insulin analogs versus standard neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) therapy in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e466-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1679. Epub 2008 Feb 25. Pediatrics. 2008. PMID: 18299307 Clinical Trial.
-
[Costs of antihyperglycemic drugs and consumables and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Results of the health care research study LIVE-DE (long-acting insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in Germany)].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Jun;134(23):1207-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1222595. Epub 2009 May 26. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009. PMID: 19472091 German.
-
Basal insulin switch from NPH to glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.Pediatr Diabetes. 2008 Jun;9(3 Pt 2):83-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00341.x. Epub 2008 Jan 25. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008. PMID: 18221431
-
Intermediate and long-acting insulins: a review of NPH insulin, insulin glargine and insulin detemir.Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Dec;22(12):2613-9. doi: 10.1185/030079906X154178. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006. PMID: 17166343 Review.
-
Dosing of insulin glargine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):987-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.018. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17692716 Review.
Cited by
-
β-Cell regeneration through the transdifferentiation of pancreatic cells: Pancreatic progenitor cells in the pancreas.J Diabetes Investig. 2016 May;7(3):286-96. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12475. Epub 2016 Feb 29. J Diabetes Investig. 2016. PMID: 27330712 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus: how can the currently available injectable insulins be most prudently and efficaciously utilised?Drugs. 2007;67(13):1813-27. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767130-00002. Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17722952 Review.
-
The role of comfort and discomfort in insulin therapy.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Aug;14(8):741-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0038. Epub 2012 Apr 26. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012. PMID: 22537418 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insulin glargine in the management of diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based assessment of its clinical efficacy and economic value.Core Evid. 2007 Nov 30;2(2):89-110. Core Evid. 2007. PMID: 21221178 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous